Categories
Covid Vaccine Information

Joe Rogan Interview with Dr. Robert Malone [Transcript and Full Interview ]

Below you can view the full interview of Joe Rogan with Dr. Robert Malone, who was recently banned on Twitter just prior to appearing on the Joe Rogan Experience. As he mentioned in the interview, he still does not know why he has been banned by Twitter as of yet. The full transcript is below for those that prefer to read through the dialogue instead of watching or listening to the entire 3-hour plus interview. While it is a very long podcast, it is worth taking the time to listen to the entire discussion.

If you are looking for it on Spotify, here is the link to the Joe Rogan Experience episode #1757.

During this 3 hour long episode, Joe and Dr. Malone talked about a wide range of topics, but some of the most common topics/keywords that came up during the interview included:

TopicTotal mentions
vaccine(s)119
virus42
Omicron29
media25
COVID25
children25
government31
CDC22
Twitter20
brain18
Delta17
myocarditis16
spike protein13
adverse events12
social media11
United States10
early treatment10
natural immunity10
clinical trials9
news initiative9
brain fog8
blood vessels8
immune response8
federal government7
New York7
immune system7
public health6
financial incentive6
dna viruses6
formation psychosis6
long covid5
drug repurposing5
attack article5
informed consent5
side effects5
Rick Bright5
common variable5
clininal development4
early treatments4
Tony Fauci4
Francis Collins4
fringe epidemiologists4
gastric distres4
financial incentives4
Thompson Reuters4
genetic vaccines4
modeling data4
self censoring4
U.C. Davis3
regulatory affairs3
free speech3
vice president3
Brett Weinstein3
fact checkers3
Janet Woodcock3
less toxic3
pharmaceutical industry3
original SARS3
blood presssure3
pharmaceutical companies3
clinical trials3
Peter McCullough3
Hong Kong3
negative efficacy3
memory cells3
deep loung3
common cold3
social distancing3
Mattias Desmet3
reporting bias3

Full Transcript of the Joe Rogan & Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. Interview

Below is the full transcript of Joe Rogan Experience episode #1757, including time stamps for the video at the top of this page if you want to jump to that part of the video.

Some of the more interesting talking points:

  • Effort to suppress the use of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin – starts at 31:48
  • 140 studies show natural immunity is better than vaccine induced immunity – 43:29
  • Trusted News Initiative and coordinated effort to suppress information around vaccines – 48:59
  • Financial incentive for hospitals to report covid deaths – 1:09:01
  • Myocarditis study out of Hong Kong showed 1 out of 2,700 boys are being hospitalized post vaccine.
  • Vaccines and menstrual cycles – 1:35:28
  • “Think twice about giving jabs to your kids. The lipids are going to the ovaries and appear to be effecting menstruation.” – 1:41:16
  • Myocarditis in boys 1:43:34
  • Brain fog 1:46:49
  • Spike proven as a toxin 1:48:43
  • T-cell suppression after jabs 1:56:59
  • “Our government is out of control” 2:30:22
  • On Pfizer: 2:44:22
  • Mass formation psychosis 2:47:41 – 2:49:36
  • If you have natural immunity, you are at higher risk if you get vaccine 2:52:50
  • Psychological damage of children 3:01:41
  • Defeat the Mandates rally 3:12:02
SpeakerTimeText
Joe Rogan0:12So first of all, thanks for coming. And very nice tie.
Dr. Robert Malone0:21[laughs] Thanks. Christmas present. Actually Ryan Cole is the one that first got these, and my wife has been jealous ever since. So this is what I got for Christmas.
Joe Rogan0:27Where does one get a COVID tie?
Dr. Robert Malone0:29I don’t know. She looked it up on Amazon or someplace and found it.
Joe Rogan0:34You got to love how industrious some of these folks are. They find a niche. Like, I know what I want to sell COVID ties. And there you go.
Dr. Robert Malone0:43I got to have a tux for an event that’s coming up in Texas in a couple of months. So my wife is writing to the guy that does the ties and to see if he can make a bow tie that’s got the virus on it.
Joe Rogan0:57Are you tired of this tired of dealing with this? Do you feel a duty to talk about this? We should just say because historically, we should just state what’s happening here. So today is the 30 December and yesterday you were kicked off Twitter. Correct.
Dr. Robert Malone1:16True.
Joe Rogan1:17We scheduled this in advance. It’s just coincidentally, that you were kicked off Twitter. What were you kicked off? First of all, before we even do this, please tell everybody what your history is and what your degrees are and what you do.
Dr. Robert Malone1:32Okay. So I’m going to do the short version. This can last for an hour if we go into the whole history of mRNA, vaccines and all that kind of stuff. My history. I was originally a Carpenter and a farmhand in the central coast of California and decided that I wanted to go back to school and did two years of computer science and then decided that I didn’t want to spend the rest of my life looking at a computer monitor in a basement. Bad decision and decided that I wanted to try to become an MD, which was a hard thing to try to do in the late 70s. So that was a real stretch. Objective went to UC Davis after two years of undergrad at San Barbara City College and wanted to work on this new tech space called molecular biology and in particular, on cancer. My mother was deathly afraid of breast cancer. And so I looked around and found a laboratory UC Davis with a guy named Bob Cardiff and another guy named Murray Gardner that were working with retroviruses and their links to breast cancer. And it just happened that while I was in there, this is circa 83 84. This whole thing cut loose in San Francisco with the Immunodeficiency syndrome in Men, and the lab ended up right at the forefront of that. Davis is just down the street, basically from San Francisco. And at the Davis Primate Center, they had discovered that there were monkeys that had immunodeficiency. And so I was there in the lab as an undergraduate, as a total bench rat. When Preston Marks and Murray Gardner and others made the first discovery of a retrovirus basis for immunodeficiency in primates. And then Murray went to the pastor, brought back the virus, literally in his pocket, went there with Bob Gallo, met with a guy named Luke Montaigne that you may know, and that kind of kicked off the whole vaccine effort for AIDS. So that’s kind of what I cut my teeth on. And so I came out of that. It was really bold to think that I could get into medical school. And I kind of overshot the Mark. I got an MD PhD scholarship at Northwestern University in Chicago. And so I went from having grown up in Santa Barbara with my wife. We were high school sweethearts to Chicago, and that was kind of an abrupt transition. So we decided I would do my graduate work at San Diego, and I’d been accepted into a program at UC San Diego that had two of the top gene therapy specialists. I really wanted to do gene therapy with retroviruses. That was what I thought was going to be my life. And so we moved down to San Diego, and I started working in the laboratory of Integra, which is in the molecular biology and Virology labs at the Salk Institute. And this is a place where graduate students normally aren’t allowed to go. There was seven Nobel laureates at the time. Plus, Jonas, a really intense, competitive environment, carved out a little niche that I was going to work on from my graduate work, which was asking questions about how retrovirus RNA is packaged. And from that, I had to develop a series of technologies to manufacture RNA and structure it and eventually put it into cells. And that through a cascade of events, being at the right place at the right time. Asking the right questions surrounded by geniuses led to the series of discoveries that now forms the basis of the RNA technology platform that gives rise to these vaccines. And ten issued patents. They were all filed in 89. So that’s kind of my origin story that it relates to this virus and vaccine in this. But since then, when I finished my MD did two fellowships at UC Davis. Top pathology for years, set up a gene therapy lab, had many other discoveries, came out to the East Coast, created a technology platform that is now the basis of the company called Inovio. We actually originally founded Inovio in the United States. This is pulsed electrical fields. They have one of the DNA vaccines for COVID. Then the planes hit the towers. The investors pulled back, and I went to work for a company called Dyneport vaccine company that had the prime systems contract as government speak for all the bio defense products for the Department of Defense for Advanced Development, which is to say, clinical trials through Licensure. And that’s my kind of transition from being an academic to focusing on actually making things that work in people and the big epiphany. There was that the world is full of these academic thought leaders that publish in big journals and stuff. But that doesn’t really lead to products. And I really wanted to make products that would help people. And so since then, for the last, I guess it’s about 20 years I’ve been focused on actually doing stuff, regulatory affairs, clinical development, getting necessary training, etc. Completed a Fellowship at Harvard University Medical School as a global clinical scholar to round out my CV, and I’ve run over 100 clinical trials, mostly in the vaccine space, but also in drug repurposing. I’ve been involved in every major outbreak since AIDS. This is kind of what I do. I’ve worn literally billions of dollars in federal grants and contracts. I’m often brought in by NIH to serve as a study section chair for awarding $80 to $120,000,000 contracts in vaccines and bio defense. I’ve spent countless hours at the CDC at the ACIP meetings. I have multiple friends at the CDC. I work closely with Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and it’s one of my favorite clients partners, teaming partners, and I work with the chem bio defense group. There’s other branches, including the other, this is not the branch that funded the Wuhan Labs. That’s another branch of DTRA. I’ve got many friends in the intelligence community, so I’m kind of a pretty deep insider in terms of the government. I know Tony Fauci personally. I’ve dealt with him my whole career, and then we had this particular outbreak, and I was tip of the spear on bringing the Ebola vaccine forward that we now call the Merck Ebola vaccine. I’m the one that got Merck involved.
Joe Rogan[advertisements removed from transcript]
Joe Rogan14:11Now, when the pandemic broke out, previous to that, you’re kind of thought of as a heretic now in some strange way.
Dr. Robert Malone14:19Pariah.
Joe Rogan14:20Yeah, pariah is probably a better word. And the fact that you’ve been banned from Twitter, it’s very confusing because I’ve been following your tweets, and I’ve been reading all the things you’ve written, and I don’t understand how it justifies a ban. And I don’t know what was the particular tweet. Did they tell you what the particular tweet was or what the offense was?
Dr. Robert Malone14:43They never tell you.
Joe Rogan14:44They never told you.
Dr. Robert Malone14:45They never tell anybody.
Joe Rogan14:46They removed you for not going along with whatever the tech narrative is, because tech clearly has a censorship agenda when it comes to COVID in terms of treatment, in terms of whether or not you are promoting what they would call vaccine, hesitancy they can ban you for that. They can ban you in their eyes. What they think is a justifiable offense, and they’re doing this. And I don’t know who these people are that are doing this, but they’re doing one of the most important things about you. Reading out your history like that is to one of the most qualified people in the world to talk about vaccines.
Dr. Robert Malone15:25Thank you for that. So one way that some people put it is and of course, since this has happened, I’ve been contacted by multiple lawyers that are looking at filing a suit just like Alex Barons and has one against Twitter. And the point is made just with what you just made. So the point that I think is kind of succinct on this is if there’s no merit to my voice being in the conversation, whether it’s true or not, whether I’m factually correct or not. Let’s park that just for a minute. Whether or not I’m right in everything I say, and I freely admit no one’s perfect. I’m not perfect that’s one of my core points is people should think for themselves. I try really hard to give people the information and help them to think, not to tell them what to think. Okay. But the point is, if it’s not okay for me to be part of the conversation, even though I’m pointing out scientific facts that may be inconvenient, then who can be allowed and whether you’re in the camp that says I’m a liar, and I didn’t invent this technology despite the patents, and there’s a whole cohort of that. No one can debate that dispute that I played a major role in the creation of this tech and virtually all other voices that have that background have conflicts of interest, financial conflicts of interest. I think I’m the only one that doesn’t. I’m not getting any money out of this. So I think that it starts to touch on some fundamental constitutional principles about rights of free speech. I suspect that’s kind of where you’re going on that.
Joe Rogan17:19Well, most certainly, but also how disturbing it is for someone who’s not an academic like myself to watch people like you get silenced and silenced in this platform of social media where people are exchanging information, they’re posting up studies and you’re discussing different parts of this pandemic that are in the news and what the issues may lie in and where your background and your expertise allows you to explain this in a way that maybe it’s not being explained because of the narrative that’s being discussed in the mainstream news. And to watch you get silenced. First of all, to watch you get Ostracized. I’ve seen that. I’ve seen people distance themselves from you. I’ve seen people call you a crazy person and criticize you, but with no specific thing to point to, it became like a tag they put on you like, oh, that guy I brought you up to someone and he goes, oh, that guy’s crazy. I go, how so there was no answer.
Dr. Robert Malone18:20Yes.
Joe Rogan18:21Okay. So this is a thing you’re going to just say, someone’s crazy when they say something that’s inconvenient or say something that makes you uncomfortable because you’ve decided to accept a certain narrative. Did Twitter warn you?
Dr. Robert Malone18:32No.
Joe Rogan18:33Was there any tweets where they said that this is misleading or anything?
Dr. Robert Malone18:38No, they never do.
Joe Rogan18:39Do you have any idea what the final tweet was or what the context was?
Dr. Robert Malone18:44I think I do. And there’s no way to confirm it until the lawyers do their lawyering. Now, I did have in the case of when I was banned from LinkedIn. Remember, this happened?
Joe Rogan18:54I wasn’t aware of that.
Dr. Robert Malone18:55Yeah. I was deplatformed from LinkedIn many months ago, and there was actually two events of deplatforming and LinkedIn. And in both cases, I was able to get an explanation for what the specific crimes were. The thought crimes. And in the first one, it was a Tweet LinkedIn posting in which I pointed out that the chairman of the board of Thomson Reuters also sits on the board of Pfizer, and I simply wrote, Does this look like a conflict of interest to you? This gets to your core question about tech. It’s not tech. It’s the horizontal integration across all major industries now under the control of common funds, all of these industries, the harmonization of the tech censorship, the interests of Pharma, big media, et cetera, and governments all being harmonized in their messaging globally. I mean, I travel a lot. I see the same. And I have physicians coming to me all the time about what they’re experiencing. The same playbook is going on every comment. But getting back to LinkedIn. So this is the first event. And Steve Kersh intervened, called up a vice President of LinkedIn.
Joe Rogan20:21And Steve Kersh is a tech guy, right?
Dr. Robert Malone20:24Yeah. He’s a Silicon Valley entrepreneur who you may or may not recall that I was on the Brett Weinstein Dark Horse podcast with Steve. That kind of lit this whole fire up months and months.
Joe Rogan20:36That’s right. Okay. That’s where I first saw him.
Dr. Robert Malone20:38Yeah. So he has great network connections in Silicon Valley. He invented the optical mouse and so he called his vice President LinkedIn. The guy looked into it. Meanwhile, people started dropping off of LinkedIn in protest and there was major press articles all over the world. And then they reinstated me and I actually got a very kind letter. This is unprecedented personal letter from this vice President apologizing and saying specifically that they didn’t have the talent to fact check me. And then therefore they were going to let me go now. Then subsequently, I got dropped again and a phone call was made and they got put on. In that case, the sin was that one of their fact checkers, because remember, this is Microsoft. One of their fact checkers had identified. The Atlantic Monthly Attack article was written about me and concluded that I was an anti vaxxer and therefore I should not be allowed on LinkedIn. Now, the context for that that’s fascinating is that Atlantic Monthly Attack article that is often cited by my detractors, and it’s a fascinating read. We could go down that rabbit hole, but no reason. It was written a few days after Peter Navarro and I came out with an op Ed in Washington Times in which we criticized Biden policy on vaccines and said that they should be reserved for those that need the most and not used universally. And we said some other things about the need of trusting and tools so that people can assess their true risk. It was a political retaliation intended to take me off the map as I was starting to interact more of a public policy sphere. Now, with this Twitter event, my wife and I have racked our brains about what is likely to have been the tweet that triggered this. And you never know. The last two that I can think of. That went out was one that was on our substance in which we referred to a fantastic video that has been put out by the Canadian COVID Care Alliance Group that summarizes all the malfeasance and data manipulation misinterpretation associated with the Pfizer vaccines and their clinical trials. It’s a supervision and of course, I guess that is interpreted as something that would cause people to become vaccine hesitant, that’s the sin in general is saying things that cause people to become vaccine hesitant. The other thing that I put out immediately before that was a post, a link to a website for the World Economic Forum that lays out their entire strategy for how they manage media, how they’re managing Kova 19 and all of their core messaging. It’s a fascinating website with links. Those are the only two things I can think of that would meet the criteria. So my position all the way through this comes off of the platform of bioethics and the importance of informed consent. So my position is that people should have the freedom of choice, particularly for their children, and that in order to appropriately choose to participate in a medical experiment, they have to be fully informed of the risks as well as the benefits. And so I’ve tried really hard to make sure that people have access to the information about those risks and potential benefits. The true unfiltered academic papers and raw data, et cetera, and the policy that’s being implemented is one in which no discussion of the risks are allowed, because by definition, they will elicit vaccine hesitants. So it can’t be discussed. But that’s the fundamental background that’s the backbone of informed consent. So informed consent is not only not happening, it’s being actively blocked. Does that make sense?
Joe Rogan25:00It does make sense, and it’s unprecedented. I can’t recall a time ever where people weren’t able to discuss the side effects of medication, whether or not the studies are accurate, whether or not people should universally take these things or whether it should be done on a person by person basis. It’s a very strange time. And so when someone who’s an expert like yourself has a dissenting opinion and you see that dissenting opinion immediately silenced or at least immediately criticized, and then these attempts at silencing, it just signifies how confusing and how troubled the times we’re in are when COVID first hit, when the lockdown started happening in March of 2020. What was your position on all this?
Dr. Robert Malone25:55You’re kind of asking my origin story with COVID?
Joe Rogan25:57Yes. Have you taken the COVID vaccine?
Dr. Robert Malone26:03So the answer is yes. I’ve also been infected twice after you took it once before I was infected at the end of February because I was attending an MIT conference on drug discovery and artificial intelligence.
Joe Rogan26:16This is pre lockdown February.
Dr. Robert Malone26:19But it goes back further than that. There’s a CIA agent that I’ve co published with in the past named Michael Callahan. He was in Wuhan in the fourth quarter of 2019. He called me from Wuhan on January 4. I was currently managing a team that was focusing on drug discovery for organophosphate poisoning, Ergo nerve agents for Ditcher defense reduction agency involving high performing computing and bio robot screening, high end stuff. And he told me, Robert, you got to get your team spun up because we got a problem with this new virus. I worked with him through prior outbreaks. So it was then that I turned my attention to this, started modeling a key protein, a protease inhibitor of this virus when the sequence was released on January 11 as the Wuhan Seafood Market virus. And I’ve been pretty much going nonstop ever since. To that point, with drug repurposing, I’m the one that originally discovered the as an agent because I was self treating myself after I got infected with agents that we identified through the computer modeling.
Joe Rogan27:43So February of 2020, you get infected. And how bad is your case?
Dr. Robert Malone27:49Bad? I thought I was going to die. You have to remember, I was up on all the latest information from China and everywhere else. I knew all about this virus. I’ve been watching the videos of people dropping the street. My lungs were burning until I took famotodine. And that relieved that.
Joe Rogan28:10And what is famotodine.
Dr. Robert Malone28:11So otherwise known as Pepsid. So just on this tangent, since I’ve said it, I’ve got some good news to announce. First time here today, we believe we should have the first patient enrolled in our clinical trials of the combination of famotodine and celecoxib for treating SARS-CoV-2. This is trials being run by the company Lidos, which is one of my clients that I’ve helped design. It’s based on my discoveries. They’re funded by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. So this is another drug combination. Now I work with all these folks like Peter and Pierre that I know.
Joe Rogan28:49You know, Peter McCollough, Pierre Kory.
Dr. Robert Malone28:53But I haven’t pushed this drug combination. I just felt it was inappropriate until we got the trials running. But they’re now open. And we passed through the FDA screening process. By the way, we tried to get we had data showing that adding Ivermectin further improved the combination. But the FDA created such enormous roadblocks to us doing an Ivermectin arm that we had to drop it. And by we, what I’m saying is the FDA created so much grief that the DoD decided the juice wasn’t worth the squeeze. And they just dropped that on.
Joe Rogan29:30Why do you think that is? What do you think is going on with the pushback on Ivermectin?
Dr. Robert Malone29:36So it’s not just Ivermectin, it’s hydroxychloroquin. And just to put a marker on that, there’s good modeling studies that probably half a million excess deaths have happened in the United States through the intentional blockade of early treatment by the US government. That is familiar, half a million. That is a well documented number. And it’s a combination of hydroxychloroquin. And I remember Mechan now when you ask me why you’re asking me to get into somebody’s head, what I can say as a scientist is what I observe, the behaviors, the actions, the correspondence, these bizarre things like, don’t you know it’s a horse drug, Y’all, which is amazingly pejorative. I live in Virginia. Okay, I can tell you the people around me, I live in a rural county, and I raise horses. That was deeply offensive to use that language in that way. But there’s clearly been an intentional push. And Zeb Zelenko, who’s a buddy, the guy that came out with the original protocols Lanko protocol, and was the one, by the way, that wrote the letter to Trump advocating for hydroxychloroquin. One kind of important to put that together. He’s put together a great little video clip in which he clearly documents the conspiracy between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright to make it so that physicians could not administer hydroxychloroquin outside of the hospital.
Joe Rogan31:10And who is Janet Woodcock? And who’s Rick Bright?
Dr. Robert Malone31:13Rick Bright was the head of BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development, which is the group that, for instance, funded the JNJ vaccine and Operation Warp Speed et Cetera. So they’re the big ticket funder in Health and Human Service of by defense products.
Joe Rogan31:29And who is she?
Dr. Robert Malone31:30Janet Woodcock was head of Operation Warp Speed for Drugs, and until very recently, head of the FDA. She is known as the person who kind of gets the credit, let’s say, for the opioid crisis, for her role at the FDA.
Joe Rogan31:48So between the two of them, there was some sort of a concerted effort to suppress the use of hydroxychloroquin.
Dr. Robert Malone31:55Rick Bright, in videotaped testimony, has explicitly spoken about how they conspired to Cook a strategy, using emergency use authorization to make it so that hydroxychloroquin could only be administered in the hospital, which, by the way, is too late for when hydroxy should be used.
Joe Rogan32:16And why do they do that?
Dr. Robert Malone32:18That is what is the unknown. And there’s so many Why’s and How’s behind this? I like to say there’s a stack of stuff that doesn’t make sense. It’s about this high. Now I can’t prove I can’t get into Rick’s head. I know Rick quite well. I don’t know what he’s currently working for the Rockefeller. He did a whistleblower case, and then he left the government. But all I know is they did this. And Rick admits on videotape that he did it. And he States that the reason was that he believed there was no evidence of hydroxychloroquin being useful for this virus. Now that’s false. hydroxychloroquin was known to be effective against SARS-1.
Joe Rogan33:09Wasn’t that regular chloroquin?
Dr. Robert Malone33:14Hydroxy and chloroquine are closely related molecules. Hydroxy is slightly less toxic, by the way, one of the nice things we had actually filed during Zika, I did a lot of drug repurposing, and I filed patents on the use of hydroxy in Zika. One of the reasons is because hydroxy is one of the few molecules that have antiviral activity that are safe in pregnancy. And you remember Zika was a pregnancy issue.
Joe Rogan33:38Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone33:39So Hydroxy has been out there for a long time is having antiviral effects. And the other part of Rick’s story, that kind of doesn’t make sense, that there was no data on efficacy, is that I was the guy that first acquired because I had Chinese connections, the Chinese protocol for treating this virus. I got it in late February, and I sent it into my buddies at the CIA, at the ASPR, at the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. So the government had those documents when Rick Bright made those determinations. So the assertion that there was no data on hydroxychloroquine at the time when this decision was made, it’s just patently false. It’s there. So what is the motivation? You’re right. None of this makes sense. This is a journalist problem. And, you know, the classic guidance is follow the money.
Joe Rogan34:38Yea.
Dr. Robert Malone34:38And it is bizarre that Merck would come out with these explicit statements about the safety of Ivermectin. Both Ivermectin and Hydroxy are on the WHO list of essential medicines. They have been administered for millions and millions of doses. They’re among the safest medicines we know when administered within this acceptable window. Pharmaceutical window. Ivor mechanism is even safer than hydroxy. So Merck coming out out of the blue and saying Ivermectin isn’t safe is really inexplicable now. Another thing is that I sit on the Active Committee for Drugs as an observer. What is the Active Committee? This is the NIH committee that’s guiding the clinical trials for these various repurposed and novel drugs. I saw listened to heard witnessed the representative of Merck that’s on the committee because the committee is full of pharmaceutical representatives, even though it’s an NIH public committee explicitly attack the decision for the federal government to test Ivermectin. She said, there’s no reason to do this. Now. What’s happened since then is Active Sticks is still testing Ivermectin, and they’ve had to go to a higher dose because as we pointed out, essentially, their initial trial design was designed to fail. It was a short course with an adequate levels of drug. And so now they’ve upped it to. I think it’s five days and 600 mg per kg. That’s the current dosing in active six. But there is clearly a concerted effort on the part of multiple players in the pharmaceutical industry in accordance with the federal government to kill Ivermectin as a potential alternative early treatment strategy.
Joe Rogan36:42And if you’re going to follow the money, the problem is, there’s not a lot in Ivermectin because it is a generic drug and any compound pharmacy can make it and it’s fairly cheap.
Dr. Robert Malone36:52It’s fairly cheap because it’s easy to make. You can get Ivermectin in bulk at less than a penny of dose.
Joe Rogan37:03Wow. So the original SARS? Is it 90% similar to SARS-CoV-2?
Dr. Robert Malone37:11Two those terms 90 or 96 or 98. Those are really not irrelevant. You can have something that’s 99.9% similar, and the difference is all the difference.
Joe Rogan37:31But if Chloroquine worked on the original SARS or it showed efficacy and original SARS, is it safe to assume without adequate tests that hydroxychloroquin would work on…
Dr. Robert Malone37:43It’s the decision that was made by the Chinese government.
Dr. Robert Malone37:45Okay, that’s my point. I got the original Chinese protocols. This is what they were using.
Joe Rogan37:49And they were using it effectively?
Dr. Robert Malone37:51Yeah.
Joe Rogan37:52So were they using Ivermectin as well? No. But other countries have, like Japan and India.
Dr. Robert Malone38:00Uttar Pradesh, as you know, has crushed COVID.
Joe Rogan38:05Can you explain what they did to do that? Because it’s kind of fascinating.
Dr. Robert Malone38:08It’s not clear. What are the drugs. So what they did do what we do know. And there’s some backstory to this that we could go into if you want to. But the observation is there was a decision made. The virus was just ripping through Uttar Pradesh. It has almost the same population as the United States. It’s huge. Okay. Dense, urban, poor, all the characteristics of the stereotypes of the Indian countryside. And the virus is just ripping through there and causing all kinds of death and disease. And the decision was made out of desperation in that province to deploy early treatments as packages widely throughout the province, and it included a number of agents. The composition has not been formally disclosed. It was done in coordination with WHO and whatever was in those packages was rumored to include Ivermectin. But there was a specific visit of Biden to Modi, and a decision was made in the Indian government not to disclose the contents of those packages that were being deployed in Uttar Pradesh, which they’re still there. And Uttar Pradesh is flatlined right now. The rest of the world is yelling about Omicron and hospitalizations. Well, South Africa isn’t, but UDA Pradesh is still flatlined in terms of deaths.
Joe Rogan39:41So they were visited by someone in the Biden administration, is that what you’re saying?
Dr. Robert Malone39:44I just know there’s a meeting between Joe Biden and Modi.
Joe Rogan39:48And you believe that out of that meeting?
Dr. Robert Malone39:51I don’t know what they said. I wasn’t invited. All I know is that immediately afterwards there was a decision not to disclose the contents of what was being deployed in Uttar Pradesh.
Joe Rogan40:01It’s so crazy to imagine that in the middle of a pandemic, there’s one place, one area of India that’s extremely successful in combating the virus, and they’re not going to say how they did it. That’s nuts.
Dr. Robert Malone40:16That’s where my stance in all of this is to say, here are the facts. Here are the verifiable data draw your own conclusion.
Joe Rogan40:27Okay. Now February of 2020, you catch it. What did you take?
Dr. Robert Malone40:33Fomotodine
Joe Rogan40:35Fomotodine and anything else?
Dr. Robert Malone40:35No, there’s nothing else available.
Joe Rogan40:37So, this was so early on the pandemic. Did you wind up being hospitalized?
Dr. Robert Malone40:41No, I did develop long COVID and people, I always get the “Why did you take the vaccine?” Well, I took it fairly early on. I took Moderna because that’s what the National Guard was deploying in my very rural county in basically central Northern Virginia.
Joe Rogan41:01Isn’t there some evidence that the vaccine actually helps people with long COVID?
Dr. Robert Malone41:06That was the rumor at the time. I took it for two reasons. I had long COVID. It was supposed to help with that. And I knew I was going to have to travel internationally to France and Portugal in the near future.
Joe Rogan41:22Now, is there any evidence that the vaccine helps against long COVID? Anecdotally, is there anything?
Dr. Robert Malone41:28Anecdotally there was and I have not seen a peer reviewed, solid publication or on preprint that supports that now. But that was the active rumor at the time. And since then, what we do know for sure. Well documented. If you’ve got prior COVID and natural immunity, you have a higher risk of adverse events from the jab. Now, the other part of my story that often gets overlooked. So I took two doses of Moderna with the second dose, I developed stage three hypertension with systolic blood pressure of up to 230. I’m lucky to be alive. What it means is I’ve had a stress test of my aorta and my cerebral vascular system, and I didn’t have a stroke, and I didn’t tear my aorta all to shreds. But it’s a good thing I had irregularities of heartbeat, credible hypertension pot syndrome, narcolepsy, restless leg syndrome. These are all known side effects that are associated with the vaccine. They’re relatively less frequent than the myocarditis in the male children in particular. But they’re all known on the list of adverse events. And it’s very clear that people that have natural immunity have a much higher risk factor for this whole spectrum of adverse events, if they get jabbed.
Joe Rogan43:03Even though that’s known, there’s so many people out there telling people who’ve just recovered from COVID to get vaccinated.
Dr. Robert Malone43:10There is a number of things here that are not supported by the science. I’ll say gently to be less gentle. Since we’re on the Joe Rogan show, I can speak freely. It’s nucking futs. This is just wrong. It’s not consistent with the data.
Joe Rogan43:29Well, it doesn’t make sense either. What we know about natural immunity is that natural immunity, at least according to that study in Israel, which is like, what, 2.5 million people. I think they said that it’s between 6 and 13 times more effective than the vaccine.
Dr. Robert Malone43:45That is 6 or 13 times more effective in hospitalized, preventing hospitalized COVID. It’s more like 20 or 27 fold better at protecting against developing the disease. Remember, infection does not equal disease.
Joe Rogan44:02Right.
Dr. Robert Malone44:04And that’s only one of over 140 studies that document that natural immunity is superior to the vaccine induced immunity. And, oh, by the way, as a vaccinologist and an immunologist, I wouldn’t expect anything different.
Joe Rogan44:18But the CDC recently disputed this, didn’t they?
Dr. Robert Malone44:23It was a fascinating play. So the CDC, for most of us that are at all objective in the science world, look at what’s going on with the CDC. The CDC has just compromised what they did with that was a very small study with intrinsic bias all over the place, much smaller than the Israeli study that you’re citing much less rigorous, less statistical power. And they push that out as their justification for their position concerning natural immunity.
Joe Rogan45:04And who funded that study?
Dr. Robert Malone45:07CDC, it would be the federal government.
Joe Rogan45:08So they funded this study. They did it themselves. The CDC, do you believe they did it with the intent of coming to the conclusion?
Dr. Robert Malone45:16You’re asking me to apply intent and I’ve had too much time with lawyers, and I’m not going to do it.
Joe Rogan45:23Good for you. So either way, there’s many, many, many studies that point to the fact that natural immunity is superior.
Dr. Robert Malone45:31Absolutely. Over 140.
Joe Rogan45:32And also multiple studies that show that people who have had COVID who get vaccinated after the fact have a higher risk, I think it’s between two and four fold. Right?
Dr. Robert Malone45:45You’re on top of the data.
Joe Rogan45:46Two and four fold risk of adverse side effects.
Dr. Robert Malone45:50Increased risk.
Joe Rogan45:51Yeah. Increased risk. So for you, you did not know this when you got vaccinated. What was your thoughts? Since this was a technology that you were pivotal part of the creation of. And so you’re getting this vaccine. You probably were thinking, look at this. All my hard work come to fruition. It’s going to protect me from the virus.
Dr. Robert Malone46:14I actually said to the nurse when I took the first job, I bragged a little bit. I usually don’t. I’m usually keep it on the down low. I don’t like to wear it on my shoulder, but I did say, you know, I invented this tech. She was really cool. Can I take a selfie?
Joe Rogan46:34Did she aspirate before she shot it into you?
Dr. Robert Malone46:37That whole aspiration thing. Yeah, I’m sure she did. Yeah. She’s a well trained nurse.
Joe Rogan46:44When you say that whole aspiration thing.
Dr. Robert Malone46:48Any skilled medical practitioner when I inject my horses, right. I breed Lucitano horses. I’ve got 20 on the farm. I give them drugs all the time. I always aspirate.
Joe Rogan46:59But I saw the shot where Joe Biden got it on TV, and they didn’t aspirate them.
Dr. Robert Malone47:06I don’t know what to say.
Joe Rogan47:08I’ll tell you what to say. (laughs)
Dr. Robert Malone47:12(laughs)Yeah.
Joe Rogan47:12So there’s no way to do it. Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone47:14And was that really a vaccine? Then we go down that whole rabbit hole.
Joe Rogan47:18That’s my favorite rabbit hole, because the fake set, remember?
Dr. Robert Malone47:21Yeah. Okay. So, you know, Joe, you’re in media. I guess what we’re experiencing is a coordinated media warfare, the level of which we have never seen before. And I and my peers who are experienced in multiple outbreaks, have never seen this level of coordinated propaganda.
Joe Rogan47:47Is this because there’s never been an outbreak that coincided with the use of social media because there really hasn’t been H1N1. Was it 2009 that that broke out?
Dr. Robert Malone47:59I was pretty active through Zika.
Joe Rogan48:02Okay.
Dr. Robert Malone48:04I don’t remember the years, but I was on LinkedIn and Twitter all the time.
Joe Rogan48:08The thing about what’s going on now, there’s a heightened aspect in terms of the influence on society that social media has that it’s stronger now than it was two years ago. It’s stronger two years ago than it was two years before. It’s ramping up exponentially in some sort of strange way that’s affecting society. And then the censorship aspect of it, which is kicked in. And as you said, they’re stepping in line with tech, doing it with the pharmaceutical companies, doing it with the government. They’re all sort of on the same page when it comes to the messaging.
Dr. Robert Malone48:48Yes. So now you’re going to the next level of WTF.
Joe Rogan48:53Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone48:59How to open that can of worms. First off, you’re aware of the Trusted News Initiative?
Joe Rogan49:07Yes. Can you explain it to people?
Dr. Robert Malone49:09Yes. So the BBC announced to the world last fall that this organization that they had led the development of which ties together big tech and big media in service of the government and was built expressly for the purpose of protecting the Democratic voting system, the democracy and voting integrity from undue influence from hostile offshore players through media information campaigns. Which you’ll recall was the claim that was made against Russia. And so this was the response of the Western Nations to build this new structure called the Trusted News Initiative that would survey all information about elections and prevent the intrusion of foreign information into the Democratic process and creation of undue influence by foreign actors. Shortly after it was created, there was an awareness in the pharmaceutical industry that this could be used to address a particular devil challenge that they had, which was the pejorative label antivaxxers that’s also been deployed against climate skeptics. Okay, so antivaxxers, you’ll recall, is the label that is used to basically take anybody out that is raising any concerns about vaccine safety. It’s the pejorative that’s applied, and it makes it really easy for the media to basically take off the table anybody that’s saying something that is contrary to the interests of really the vaccine industry. So there was a decision that this same toolkit, the same integrated international media and high tech organization led by the BBC would be pivoted to resisting vaccine misinformation and disinformation. And they put out a proud press announcement last fall that this is what they’re going to do. And they defined these things misinformation and disinformation as anything which was going to lead to vaccine hesitancy and which was contrary to the official statements of the World Health Organization or the respective national health organizations. So if CDC says the world is flat, then the world is flat and there will be no discussion about whether or not the world is flat. I’m using obviously simplified, silly example. So whatever the CDC or Tony Fauci or Tedros, etc. Says is truth by definition, and any information or discussion which is contrary to that truth will be suppressed. It will be deleted. And those people that are expressing these opinions that would lead to vaccine hesitancy, which to some eyes would be informed consent and decisions by an individual that they believe the risk benefit ratio doesn’t matter. It doesn’t make sense to them that information will not be allowed and those people that are spreading that information will not be allowed to interact in the public sphere in social media. Okay. So if you want to unpack this whole thing, it starts by understanding the Trusted News Initiative, and we’ve got great links about that that have been put out explanatory and links. For instance, I put out a substack recently that talks about the Trusted News Initiative and the censorship in which I link to both the BBC’s Trusted News Initiative website, so you can see what they have to say and a video that describes the Trusted News Initiative from my point of view as somebody who’s been on the receiving end of the Trusted News Initiative. Now that’s the starting point. But it doesn’t explain the global coordination because TNI is mostly Western and it doesn’t cover a lot of the other Latin America, for instance, or Spain or Israel. And the only way that I can understand how all of this messaging censorship deplatforming…what it really is is canceling. And Bobby Kennedy makes the point that the first real example of cancel culture that we can track is Tony Fauci canceling the esteemed virologist Peter Duesberg, because he was raising questions about the origin of HIV and its role in the disease called AIDS. I remember when that happened.
Joe Rogan54:36I had on my podcast a long time ago, and it was the first time I ever got, like, extreme pushback from people that were like, I mean, this is after protease inhibitors had been used, so it didn’t even make sense. And people are saying, you have blood on your hands. People are going to die because of this podcast. And I’m like, what are you saying? This is a guy who’s a biologist at University of California, Berkeley.
Dr. Robert Malone55:00Full professor.
Joe Rogan55:00Yeah. I mean a brilliant guy.
Dr. Robert Malone55:02Yeah, totally. One of the best virologists of his generation, full stop.
Joe Rogan55:06And very controversial opinions. But the only way to find out if someone’s controversial opinions are valid is to ask questions and talk to them and let them express themselves. And then I wanted to have someone come on and debate him. I could not find anyone willing to do it.
Dr. Robert Malone55:24This is covered in detail in Bobby Kennedy’s book about Tony Fauci. It’s one of the great case studies. Now we have a more recent example of this canceled culture as it’s played by NIH and by Tony in the emails that came out recently. When you have Cliff Lane, Tony Fauci, and the director of the NIH, Francis Collins basically coming out and saying that they’re going to ridicule and destroy fringe epidemiologists. And what was their sin? These fringe epidemiologists that warranted a concerted effort on the part of the federal government to destroy them. Their sin was raising questions about the effectiveness of vaccine lockdowns. Okay. And who were these fringe epidemiologists? As stated by Francis Collins, who by the way, has no background in epidemiology or public health. He’s a sequencing guy. That’s his claim to Fame as the Human Genome Project and the Cystic Fibrosis transmembrane regulatory protein. He has no background in immunology, no background in vaccinology, no training in public health. But who are these three fringe epidemiologists? Well, they happen to be full professors from obscure universities, Oxford, Harvard and Stanford.
Joe Rogan56:47They were warning about Lockdowns.
Dr. Robert Malone56:48They were warning about Lockdowns in the Great Barrington Declaration. That’s what prompted that.
Joe Rogan56:53Did you explain the Great Barrington Declaration?
Dr. Robert Malone56:55So these three esteemed, high profile academic epidemiologists came together and said and did an analysis, comprehensive analysis about everything that was known about Lockdowns and their impacts during infectious disease outbreaks. And they came out with a specific statement. You can find it on the Web. Look upgrade Barrington declaration and they came out with a specific statement that these lockdowns were going to cause more harm than help, which was contrary to the messaging that was being put out by Tony. And so Tony decided that they had to be destroyed. And then you had Francis Collins recently coming on Fox News after these emails were FOIAd and brought out into the open and saying that if we had followed their advice, millions of people would have died. This is the fallback. Anytime you criticize these guys, what they say is, oh, you’re killing people.
Joe Rogan57:58[ads removed from transcript]
Dr. Robert Malone1:01:01I mean they do it to me too.
Joe Rogan1:01:04So if they had just done what Sweden had done and some other countries where they did Institute lockdowns and they sort of let people just live their lives and make their own choices, they were saying that millions of people would have died.
Dr. Robert Malone1:01:19So it seems.
Joe Rogan1:01:20But time has shown that Sweden actually had a more effective take on the virus. It was highly criticized in the beginning. People were really concerned that they weren’t taking it seriously enough. And then there was also some concern that you couldn’t compare, they weren’t comparable because the way Sweden is small towns and they’re separated from each other. It’s not a high density situation like New York or Los Angeles or Chicago. But overall, in time, we’ve seen that this respiratory disease spreads period, no matter what, it seems to make its way to people, no matter where you are and what it’s done in that country is it’s kind of burned through the population and their mortality rate is lower than most places. Their infection rate is lower than most places, and it didn’t do the devastating economic damage and the devastating damage to children that were forced to isolate and not be with their friends and not go to school and not socialize.
Dr. Robert Malone1:02:24So here’s an even more fun one that just cuts right to it. The pejorative these days is the country’s name is actually Pfizreal. It’s no longer Israel. The Israeli people are very compliant with their government and the government has a financial deal with Pfizer, obviously. Okay, and they only have fizzer vaccine, and they’re now on job number four. There’s a natural experiment that’s occurring in the Palestinian territory in the surrounding States. Those surrounding States in the Palestinian territory does not have that level of vaccine uptake at all. The mortality in the surrounding States and the Palestinian Authority is substantially less from this virus than the mortality in Israel.
Joe Rogan1:03:17Now, is it factored by age? What are the variables?
Dr. Robert Malone1:03:26Good question. And this is akin to this mystery , mystery, sorry, of what’s going on in central Africa and the malaria belt, where you have really low levels of mortality and what you’re hitting on appropriately, you’re getting right to the core of the issue is confounding variables. And in general, the Israeli population is a little bit older than the Palestinian territory on average, so that’s a lower risk. Neither one of them are associated with high rates and mortality of obesity. And so that variable seems to be out. That may be one of the major variables in Africa is that in that malaria belt, people generally aren’t fat. They happen to also be taking Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquin for the Indigenous parasites that they have to deal with. So a lot of people were saying, Well, that must prove that hydroxy and Ivermectin protect. Well, not so. As you point out, there’s a lot of moving parts here. This is why I’m glad you didn’t ask me, “Why is that, Robert?” Because I would have said, I can’t say, because there’s too many confounding variables. However, it is a fascinating observation that we have this intensively vaccinated cohort in Israel and much, much less vaccinated cohorts in the surrounding states. And you can look it up on Worldometer. You don’t have to believe me. Your audience is smart enough. They can go on Worldometer and look it up and look at the mortality and morbidity in these different countries and figure it out for themselves.
Joe Rogan1:05:15Is the rate of infection.
Dr. Robert Malone1:05:17Comparable rate of infection is a really hard variable because it’s a function of the density of testing. And so this is one of those situations. The more you look for it, the more you find, which is why you really can’t use that as a denominator is the incidence of infection, because the incidence of infection is totally contaminated by the frequency of testing and the density of testing. So you have to rely on things, really the only thing close to a decent outcome indicator that isn’t subject to all of this bias that’s all over in the system, except in a few States. Iceland, the Scandinavian States generally have relatively clean data. The UK, to some extent has cleaner data. It’s now clear that the Israeli data set is contaminated by all kinds of monkey business in terms of what gets deleted. But the only thing that seems close to a reasonable outcome variable is all cause mortality. People get kind of wrapped up around this, and they say, well, these deaths that were everybody argues both sides of the coin with the VAERS system. That means nothing. And then, oh, well, in the CDC uses it, it means everything right, and it’s okay for them to use it as a numerator. But it’s not okay for anybody else to use it.
Joe Rogan1:06:49And for people don’t know, we’re talking about. We’re talking about the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
Dr. Robert Malone1:06:53That’s theirs, which the FDA explicitly said in the licensure package for commercial, is inadequate to detect rare adverse events. That’s why they forced. If they ever market commercial in the United States, they’re going to have to do a bunch of clinical trials, which I think is one reason why they’re not doing it, because the FDA has told them that VAERS is basically junk, but it’s the best we got. When you look at these ratios. The argument is, well, just because somebody died within X number of days of receipt of vaccine, it doesn’t mean their death is vaccine caused. It’s vaccine correlated. That’s fair. But it’s the only variable we have, and it’s consistent in that we’ve had that variable in that outcome measure for decades. So then we can look at trends. But what we see is this explosion of vaccine associated deaths to kind of pick that apart, people say, well, if you had a car accident or a bullet to the head and you went to the hospital and they tested you with a PCR test, that’s nonspecific and they ran it up to 42 cycles, and they said, oh, look, there’s the virus. (By the way, they have a financial incentive to do that) that results in a false positive death. True. But the other side of the coin is that if somebody’s having brain fog or they have a stroke while they’re driving a car and they crash and die and they’ve had it within 48 hours of when they took the jab. And we know the Jabs caused blood clotting and strokes. Well, then it could well be that an auto accident is vaccine related. Catch my point?
Joe Rogan1:08:46Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone1:08:47So all these kind of things, you can’t sort out what’s what, you just kind of have to take the aggregate value and hope that you have a large enough sample size, that it corrects for all that stuff, all that noise that’s inherent in the system.
Joe Rogan1:09:01Now you just glossed over the financial incentive to report a COVID death. What is that? What is the financial incentive? Because there’s all these rumors that you would hear about what a hospital gets paid for COVID death and that the government gives them money and that they’re incentivized to make something mark it down.
Dr. Robert Malone1:09:22It’s not rumors. Now, I don’t have the specific numbers at the top of my head. I’m not a hospitalist. I’m not a hospital administrator, but the numbers are quite large. There’s something like a $3,000, basically, death benefit to a hospital. If it can be claimed to be covered, there’s a financial incentive to call somebody COVID positive. The CDC made a determination in year one. This is why all of our baseline data is junk.
Joe Rogan1:09:50What is the financial incentive to say that they’re covered positive? That’s why the PCR cycles are ramped up so high.
Dr. Robert Malone1:09:59Again, you’re asking causation. I can tell you that the hospitals receive a bonus from the government. I think it’s like $3,000. If someone is hospitalized and able to be declared covert positive, they also receive a bonus. I think the total is something like $30,000 incentive. If somebody gets put on the van, then they get a bonus if somebody is declared dead with COVID. So they have an incentive at the front end to declare somebody a covert case. The CDC made a determination that they were going to make a core assumption. If PCR positive and you die, that is death due to COVID. And so the extreme example, just to show the absurdity. If the patient comes in with a bullet hold of head and they do a nose swab and they come up PCR positive, they’re determined to have died from COVID when, in fact, they died from lead poisoning.
Joe Rogan1:11:14That’s real.
Dr. Robert Malone1:11:15Yeah.
Joe Rogan1:11:15So they’ve really done that with gunshot victims I don’t know about.
Dr. Robert Malone1:11:18Yeah, for sure. Trauma and other things.
Joe Rogan1:11:21I’ve seen that said. But I’ve always thought that’s ridiculous. There’s no way a hospital.
Dr. Robert Malone1:11:28It’s not a question of what the hospital would do. It’s a question of Med codes.
Joe Rogan1:11:32So the code is set that if you swab that person and you’re supposed to swap them and you get a positive signal, are you obligated to swap them no matter who they are, if they come in with an injury.
Dr. Robert Malone1:11:46I believe it’s the common practice. I don’t know whether there would be an obligation that would be a hospital by hospital policy statement.
Joe Rogan1:11:54So that it really is true that if someone has a gunshot wound and they’re dying of that gunshot wound and you check them for COVID, and if they’re COVID positive and they die, they Mark that off as a COVID death.
Dr. Robert Malone1:12:06That is, by definition, from the CDC. That was a decision that was made early on.
Joe Rogan1:12:11That seems insane.
Dr. Robert Malone1:12:17That’s why so many of us are so much in arms, up in arms and really pretty aggravated about what’s going on is all the way through this. Let me put it this way, Joe. Part of the reason I know you’re somebody who is really committed to bringing everybody together and the idea that we’re really one America, we’re one people. We shouldn’t be divided like this.
Joe Rogan1:12:46I like that for the whole world.
Dr. Robert Malone1:12:49Amen.
Joe Rogan1:12:49Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone1:12:50Amen. Okay. We’re aligned.
Joe Rogan1:12:52We’re just humans.
Dr. Robert Malone1:12:53Thank you. But we’ve been divided in this way, and it’s all been politicized. And the data have been so thoroughly manipulated that it’s hard for any of us to make sense out of it. And all the way through our government. At least I can’t speak to Great Britain or Germany. But our government has had a series of checkpoints where they have a job to do. And I know this because this is what I do for a living. I do regulatory affairs and clinical development. We wouldn’t be having all of this conflict about what is truth if the FDA had done its job, what the FDA didn’t do was force the pharmaceutical manufacturers to do their job. Now we can wrap around. Well, maybe it was just they were all in a rush. We were all panicked, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But the bottom line was they didn’t do their job, and they didn’t force Pharma to do its job. And they didn’t employ the standard requirements for testing and verification that Pharma was doing its job that I would expect to experience as a clinical researcher on one of my studies. What’s going on with Pfizer if the whistleblower comments hold true? And, for instance, the Maddie De Gary case, this young woman who was listed as having a stomachache that participated in the FISA trials when, in fact, what she had was a seizure, and she’s now wheel bound, wheelchair bound with a NASA gastric tube. One of 1000 subjects.
Joe Rogan1:14:33This is a 13 year old girl, right. That was a part of the study. And they wrote it down as what gastric distress. That’s literally what it says in terms of the adverse effect, gastric distress. What is gastric distress?
Dr. Robert Malone1:14:50Stomachache.
Joe Rogan1:14:50That’s it. But how do they account for all the other injuries?
Dr. Robert Malone1:14:53They don’t.
Joe Rogan1:14:54They don’t they take her off of the study. That’s totally unethical. Right. So who’s signing off on that? How are they allowed to do that?
Dr. Robert Malone1:15:06So the way the rules work in regulatory affairs. So this is law, right? This is regulatory affairs, law in common practice at the FDA. And globally, there’s all kinds of treaties and things that regulate how these things are supposed to be done. The rule is it used to be that a pharmaceutical company could kind of offload all the liability for bad stuff that might happen in a clinical trial and be mismanaged, et cetera onto the performer, the subcontractor. It used to be that Pharma actually did the trials themselves, and then they found it was cheaper, more efficient, and they could push off their liability if they engaged companies like I’ve been working for for decades, contract research organizations, clinical contract research organizations. And so that was done for a while. And if anything went bad in the trial, then the farmer could say, oh, it wasn’t us. It was those guys. Now, over the last few years, the FDA got wise to that. And they made policy that the responsibility vests with the sponsor that’s fancy regulatory speak for it. Pharma owns it. Okay. So you ask the question, whose responsibility is it to ensure that the data isn’t contaminated and manipulated? The answer is Pfizer.
Joe Rogan1:16:24Wow. So they’re responsible for the data. They’re allowed to say that this was just some sort of a gastric distress.
Dr. Robert Malone1:16:33And the job of the FDA always is to ferret out monkey business, which happens all the time, whether intentional or unintentional. And there’s all kinds of ways you can craft clinical trials and craft clinical trials, study reports, final study reports to hide the bad stuff and highlight the good stuff.
Joe Rogan1:16:57So in this clinical trial that this young lady was involved in, how many children were involved in the study?
Dr. Robert Malone1:17:04It’s 2000, approximately. But they’re split into placebo and experimental groups. And so she was in the treatment group.
Joe Rogan1:17:11Now, one of the things that people have said in response to the vaccine injuries is that it’s approximately one in 1000. They are getting these significant injuries, like myocarditis. And.
Dr. Robert Malone1:17:28It’S important when we talk about these things to make a distinction between an event that is clinically significant and might result in hospitalization versus something that might be undetected unless you did a laboratory test or maybe, like, for instance, myself, when I started to experience those things that I experienced after Mederna, I was confused. It was not listed as among the side effects. I thought I just suddenly developed rampant hypertension until the data started coming out. And fortunately, I had an Astute cardiologist that got me into control and got me under medical management. And then I looked into it. Oh, this is one of the known side effects. And then time went by and it became more and more clear. So the point is that what gets reported in a study is often biased by how the study is structured, because one list, when you write the study protocol, you list expected adverse events. And so people, if those things happen, oftentimes they get checked. But I guarantee one of the expected adverse events was not seizure and paralysis. Okay, now what they did. One of the things. There’s all kinds of tricks you can play with the data if you’re so inclined. And that’s why it’s so important. People like me that do clinical research for a living. We get drummed into our head bioethics on a regular basis. It’s obligatory training, and we have to be retrained all the time because there’s a long history of physicians doing bad stuff, muggy business. And the most notable, of course, in common knowledge, is the Tuskegee experiments. So it happens there’s all kinds of financial incentives to make bad stuff go away and highlight good stuff, makes the sponsor happy. And then you get another contract. These are not little contracts. Modest clinical trial is $20 million. A big one is 100 million or more. These are big money deals. You want to keep that money flowing and you want to keep your sponsor happy. So that’s what’s come out with a whistleblower with Pfizer is that the contractor? I think it’s here in Texas that ran a bunch of those clinical trials appears to have manipulated data in a variety of ways. And this is done at the level of checking the data and reconciling the data and deciding which things go into the database and which things don’t go into the database. And whether or not well, if somebody had an adverse event after shot one and then they’re dropped because they won’t take shot two, do we drop them out of this overall study analysis? That’s why we have all this specific language that we use in our business, the intent to treat cohort, the per protocol, cohort these are separate analysis. They describe these differences because it’s known that you can manipulate the data in these different ways. And it’s clear now. And basically, this was the subject, by the way, just to bring it back around to our first topic. This is the subject of that presentation that the Canadians put out that I put in that Twitter post was all the different ways that the Pfizer data was manipulated.
Joe Rogan1:21:17The fact that that is grounds for being removed from Twitter is so astonishing. Just it blows my mind that that’s the number one platform for distributing information right now, and that things like that are happening there because it is essentially the number one that and Facebook. I don’t know which one is bigger, but for distributing information.
Dr. Robert Malone1:21:41So what’s recently taken place? Remember, looping back. I talked about the interconnectedness at the board level between Pfizer and Thompson Reuters.
Joe Rogan1:21:52Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone1:21:53Okay. Thompson Reuters has become the fact checker of choice for determining quotes. Fact checkers. Right. So we can go into the Facebook lawsuit that recently broke that whole story open. But Thompson Reuters is tied to Pfizer. They have common corporate ownership, and they are the fact checker of Twitter. Now they’re integrated. Thompson Reuters is making the decision, which has connections to Pfizer about what information will be allowed to be discussed on Twitter.
Joe Rogan1:22:37That is crazy. It’s so crazy to even hear. And I don’t know how we ever pull out of this mess. I mean, I think we are at a 45 deg downward angle, headed into a mountain. I really do. It’s so strange to me that no one is up in arms about this other than a few people that have been censored, a few people that have these opposing viewpoints that are deemed to be something that can’t be discussed.
Dr. Robert Malone1:23:05Well, Joe, it’s even deeper than that. Okay, then there’s the hunting of physicians. So I myself. Peter McCullough is the textbook example of hunting physicians. Right. The guy is 150,000 in debt right now in the whole in trying to defend his medical license. This is one of the most highly published authors in the world. He’s an exceptional researcher and apparently pretty good podcaster, too.
Joe Rogan1:23:37The guy has published more in his field than any other physician in history.
Dr. Robert Malone1:23:43And Baylor is trying to take him out. And it’s not only Baylor, it’s some entity outside of Baylor that’s come in and is financing the attacks on him, but just to bring it home. Really, not to make it all about me, but to be able to speak in the first person. Okay. So I went to Maui with a bunch of physicians a few months ago, and we gave talks and did training about early treatments. We didn’t talk about vaccines. There’s only one hospital on Maui on the island of Maui. It’s owned by a it’s basically a Kaiser Permanente satellite. Okay. So we went there. We gave that talk. That hospital and the hospitalists associated with it are actively involved and have kicked out Kirk Milhound because he’s giving early treatment with the horse drug. I’ve remected him. Okay. Now, who is Kirk Millhound? Why is he in this hospital? What is he qualified? He’s an MD, PhD, pediatric cardiologist with his PhD training at UC San Diego in vascular inflammation. He is among the most qualified individuals in the world for managing COVID and commenting on cardiomyocarditis in children. And they’ve kicked him out of the hospital just for prescribing Ivory for early treatment. Okay. He also happens to be a pastor at a local congregation. He runs a food bank. His whole life, he has traveled to emerging economies to provide free treatment. This is the kind of exemplary person that we all should be in the best of all possible worlds.
Joe Rogan1:25:32And did they give an excuse for this? Are they saying that his prescription of early treatment promotes vaccine?
Dr. Robert Malone1:25:39Hesitancy is there anything he’s prescribing ineffective drugs and putting people’s lives at risk. But here’s the point. I’m not even there yet. Okay, we’re just winding up on this one, right? So the other day, right before Christmas, three days before Christmas, I get a package from my licensing agency, which I’m licensed through the state of Maryland. So the state of Maryland medical Board sends me a package, and it is a complaint that’s been filed against me. I have six days to respond. Basically, I end up having to respond on Christmas Day or earlier to this attack, claiming that I should lose my medical license. And the citations are that I didn’t actually invent mRNA vaccines. A copy of the Atlantic Monthly Attack article on me claims that I’m licensed in Virginia, which I’m not claims that I didn’t graduate from Harvard Medical School, which I did. So I have to respond to all this stuff now in going through it, and it’s just false, false. All came in and pulled a bunch of stuff off Twitter and LinkedIn and sent it in and saying, Well, this is the reason why this guy should lose his license because he is responsible for millions of deaths. He said it straight out. Okay. I’m responsible for millions of deaths because of what I’ve said on social media. Now, who is it that’s filing this? It turns out it’s the director of recruitment and external affairs of this hospital in Maui. This guy felt that it was necessary to send this little package of happiness right before Christmas to my licensing board to try to get my license taken away. What we’re seeing across the United States and across the world is it’s the hospitals and the hospitals that are attacking outside physicians?
Joe Rogan1:27:43Do you have any knowledge as to why they’re doing this other than speculation.
Dr. Robert Malone1:27:48If I was to follow the money, I’m going to put it that way again. I can’t get into their heads. Of course, I don’t know what’s making them do this. It’s crazy. Never been done before.
Joe Rogan1:27:58Right?
Dr. Robert Malone1:27:59It’s happening. We went and did a presentation in Alaska, and the same thing was being done for the physicians that came out and spoke about early treatment in Alaska. And fortunately, the Alaska Licensing Board put out a very terse statement that they don’t want to get involved in politics in this kind of tit for tat and that this is outside of their role. Medical licensing boards for this kind of stuff are usually involved in making determinations about somebody’s suitability because of drug abuse or sexual activity or other things which are outside or malpractice overt malpractice. Okay. This kind of political weaponization of medical licensing boards is new. Now, here’s the observation that I can make if we follow the money is that hospitals are incentivized to treat covered patients. The thing that ties all this little part of this story together, including the suppression through the government of early treatment. Hospitals are incentivized financially to treat COVID patients. If covered patients are being treated outside of the hospital and prevented from going to the hospital, such as the case in the Imperial Valley, where Brian Tyson, George Fareed have saved thousands and thousands of lives of Indigenous Latinos that are coming across the border and working the fields. They’re breaking their backs to save the poor. Amazing story there with early treatments. And I guess they’re left alone because they’re in the Imperial Valley, and nobody cares. They’re all poor. But in these urban environments, there are all these incentives for hospitals to treat COVID patients. And if people are giving treatments that are keeping those people out of hospitals, then they’re not getting that revenue.
Joe Rogan1:29:59So your speculation, if I just could unpack this, that doctor in Maui who was giving early treatment, you think that the reason why he was targeted because he was directly costing the hospital money because people weren’t going in.
Dr. Robert Malone1:30:17I’m saying that the observation is that early treatment keeps people out of the hospital and that hospitals have financial incentives, including death incentives, financial discourage, early treatment. And the other data point is these that are doing the attacking are almost universally hospital administrators and hospitalists.
Joe Rogan1:30:45So these aren’t physicians by hospitals.
Dr. Robert Malone1:30:48I mean, hospital based physicians.
Joe Rogan1:30:50Okay. What does that mean, then why are they doing it?
Dr. Robert Malone1:30:53Because they’re part of that system of that hospital system.
Joe Rogan1:30:56The administrators, they would be doing that because…..
Dr. Robert Malone1:31:02I don’t want to make accusations. I’m observing facts, right?
Joe Rogan1:31:08I want to bring this back to something we were talking about earlier, but we kind of move past it. We were talking about the 1 in 1,000 statistic, right.
Dr. Robert Malone1:31:16So a recent paper out of Hong Kong, comprehensive analysis, myocarditis in boys hospitalized. Okay. That makes sense? That’s word string. So that’s the data analysis. So that’s saying, the myocarditis was so bad after vaccination, and these are all verified post vaccinations. The myocarditis was so bad that you went to the hospital. Incidence rate is 1 in 2,700. Now there’s all kinds of hand waving that oh, myocarditis is mild and they recover from it. Those statements aren’t, let’s say, gently based in fact, historic incidence of death post myocarditis is about 27%. Now, the assertion is, well, this is a different kind of myocarditis, and therefore it’s not going to kill these kids or young adults. Okay. But that’s being said in the absence of data, it’s pure speculation.
Joe Rogan1:32:16Right. And why are they doing that? Because they keep saying that the instances of myocarditis are mild. I keep hearing that that it’s mild myelocarditis and that it eventually goes away, but not citing any studies. And I don’t think there are any long term studies, no children that can’t be right by definition, right?
Dr. Robert Malone1:32:36Because we haven’t done what we have always done. Okay, so let me say this. People ask me, Robert, you’re the inventor of this tech. You’re a vaccinologist. Why are you speaking out? This was the whole topic of the Atlantic Monthly Attack article. Why is this person become a vaccine? Skeptic? Did they talk to you extensively? And three days before this thing came out, the journalist, it’s a fascinating young man. He previously publishes basically on woke issues in the Chronicle of Higher Education. This is his first big article. He was clearly hired, and they explicitly say the article was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Zuckerberg Chan Initiative. Robert Wood Johnson is the major shareholder in J and J. And Zuckerberg Chan, of course, is Facebook. So Facebook and Zuckerberg Chan have funded this Attack article by this guy that normally writes about wokeness in the Journal of Higher Education, and he was totally obsessed over this question. Robert, why are you saying these things? You must have some financial incentive. There must be some reason why you’re doing this man in person. No, just over the phone. Okay. And I told him repeatedly because it’s the right thing to do. I get this consternation. But see, the thing is, I think I may be the only one that has been involved deeply in the development of this tech that doesn’t have a financial stake in it. So for me, the reason is because what’s happening is not right. It’s destroying my profession. It’s destroying the practice of medicine worldwide. It’s destroying public health in medicine. I am a vaccinologist. I spent 30 years developing vaccine, a stupid amount of education, learning how to do it and what the rules are. And for me, I’m personally offended by watching my discipline get destroyed for no good reason at all, except apparently financial incentives. And I don’t know political ass covering.
Joe Rogan1:34:54Now back to this number because we keep going past it and going off on tangents. The number that keeps getting cited is one in 1000 people have adverse events, including myocarditis. If myocarditis that requires hospitalization is 1 in 2700.
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:13In boys.
Joe Rogan1:35:14In boys. But there’s also issues of people that have something, like fatigue…
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:23Oh those are the little ones.
Joe Rogan1:35:24…that has lasted post vaccination. But there’s a lot of those.
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:28There’s a huge number of dysmenorrhea and menometrorrhagia.
Joe Rogan1:35:32What are those?
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:33This is alterations in menses in women.
Joe Rogan1:35:37Oh right, that’s a huge issue.
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:39And they deny it.
Joe Rogan1:35:41Menses, we mean menstrual cycles, women going to menopause very young, like, I know a girl who’s 36, who got the vaccine, hasn’t had her period in eight months.
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:49And then there is the women who are post menopausal that suddenly start bleeding.
Joe Rogan1:35:54Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone1:35:54So here’s the thing about this, Joe. That kind of ties this together. I’m in the business. It’s basically the part of what I do is like a detective, figuring out because I’m trained in pathology. Why is this happening? What are the things that connect these things? Okay, so what is it that drives menstruation? The answer is the ovary. The ovary is the controller through hormones and ovulation. What did we learn early on from the Pfizer data package, which, by the way, when that was disclosed by Byram Bridle from Japan and sent to me, was the first thing that really lit me up and let me know that something here was rotten. And when I got that I picked out as Byram had done, I was given the task of independently evaluating it. And then I took that package and I gave it to a more senior regulatory professional that I respect. And I said, These are the things I see. This looks really bad. He looked at it and he said, oh, you miss this thing. That the other thing. Okay. These missing things include reproductive toxicology, evaluations of tyratogenicity, birth facts, standard stuff that’s always done. Genotoxicity, not done. What was done was a cobbled together group of data that didn’t even evolve the vaccine and used other mRNAs in non-GLP. That’s fancy talk for not done with rigor studies, not done according to the rules. All cobbled together and sent into the regulatory agencies of the world to justify going ahead and giving jabs to everybody under emergency use authorization. That’s the truth of it. That’s the short version that’s using common language. One of the studies they did do was administer these lipid RNA complexes to rodents and showed the distribution of the synthetic lipid component. That’s the fats that package the RNA that let it slip into your cells. It’s a synthetic chemical, positively charged molecule. It’s a fat with a charge on the end. It goes to the ovary at a very high rate. It’s like 11% of the lipids. Now, this wasn’t supposed to happen. It was supposed to stay in the arm where it got jabbed, but it doesn’t. It goes all over the body, and it goes to two places that are really kind of anomalous bone marrow and ovaries. Now the ovarian signal is really clear because it doesn’t happen in testes. So now you got a molecule synthetic molecule going to an organ, the ovary, that controls menstruation in a nonclinical model, rodent. And subsequently, it’s deployed widely in humans. And you have this phenomena of alteration in menstrual cycle. Now, one of the things that was fascinating. I was asked to testify to the Hasidic Jew Rabbinical Court in New York. A lot of interesting things happen with that. It’s like sitting around with 15 different Gandolphs. It’s one of those bucket list things, I guess, talking to them. It turns out that the rabbis in the Hasidic Jew community carefully monitor. We don’t need to go into how the menstrual cycle of the fertile women in their congregations closely monitor it because there is strict guidance about cleanliness and intercourse. And they had a major problem because these are all 60 plus up to 80 long beards right here that had exquisite understanding about the menstrual cycle and all the women in their congregations. And they all knew that these menstrual cycles were being disrupted all the time. And for them, this was a major crisis because it meant that if you’re in the Hasidic community, increasing the size of the population of Hasidic Jews is kind of important to you. It’s centrally important to them. And this was a major threat to reproductive health in their communities. Now they took all this testimony. They thought about it, and they came out with a clear statement that children should not be vaccinated. This has the power of law in this community should not be vaccinated in adults. It’s strongly discouraged. And part of the reason is because of these alterations in reproduction. And again, the point, what’s the common variable is the ovary. This is why I say in my little statement that’s gone all over the world, this little four minute clip that’s kind of gone viral and triggered governments to attack me now, like Israel in Spain and Italy, in the same systematic pattern of trying to demean me and delegitimize me. But that’s why I say in that, think twice about giving these jabs to your kids, among other things. Your girls are born with all the eggs they will ever have. And these lipids are going to the ovaries, and they appear to be affecting menstruation in some way. But menstruation is just one of these adverse events. You picked out some of the other ones, the fatigue, brain fog, all kinds of things.
Joe Rogan1:41:44And to be fair, people get that from COVID as well. Correct?
Unknown1:41:48True.
Dr. Robert Malone1:41:48Absolutely true. And that’s another fascinating variable is we have COVID, we have mRNA genetic vaccines, and we have DNA virus administered genetic vaccines. That’s the J&J here in the United States. Adenovirus. Okay. And they all have these symptoms of clotting, brain fog and other things. So, this is basically does it walk like a duck and quack like a duck. What is the common variable between those three very different systems? Natural viral infection, mRNA, genetic vaccines and DNA genetic vaccines. Now, we don’t see these problems. By the way, adenoviral vectored vaccines have been in development for my entire life, 30 years. They’re licensed adenoviral vectored vaccines. They don’t have these problems. So it’s something that’s not intrinsic to the platform. What is it? The common variable is spike, just to cut to the chase.
Joe Rogan1:42:52Spike protein.
Dr. Robert Malone1:42:53Yea.
Joe Rogan1:42:54And so the spike protein is probably causing all these problems with people who have caught COVID and also people who are getting the vaccine. But then the Lipo. What is it? Lipo nanoparticle?
Dr. Robert Malone1:43:10That’s fine. That’s a good term.
Joe Rogan1:43:11How do you say it?
Dr. Robert Malone1:43:13I call them lipoplexes. Lipid nanoparticles is another term.
Joe Rogan1:43:17Lipid nanoparticles so these are the ones that are affecting the ovaries.
Dr. Robert Malone1:43:21No, it’s the lipid part of it in particular that goes to the Ovaries, not the RNA.
Joe Rogan1:43:26And that aspect of it is not affecting men, but with men, you have a higher instance of myocarditis. And why is that?
Dr. Robert Malone1:43:34Good question, what is driving the myocarditis? So there are a variety of hypotheses about this. What we do know is that both the virus and these vaccines are associated with here’s another fancy medical term, microcoagulation or micro coagulopathy, the latter one being a disease of micro coagulation, small blood clots. Okay, there are multiple ways in which that can happen. It’s clear that spike is associated with a variety of mechanisms that trigger coagulation, including an autoimmune one. So there’s something about this protein. Spike is whether it’s in the vaccine or not, it binds to the surface of key cells through a key regulatory protein called ACE2. ACE2 is involved in controlling blood pressure, blood vessel tone, all kinds of stuff. If you activate ACE2 on the little tiny, smooth muscle cells that wrap around your capillaries that control your vascular tone, that’s your blood pressure locally, the ability of blood to go through those tubes, that’s controlled basically, you’ve got these little muscles, cellular muscles that control the contraction. It’s kind of like peristalsis, if you know what that is. The kind of process that can move something down a tube, like in our gut, the way we move food and waste material through our gut and eventually excrete it, that’s peristalsis. The thing that brings it down through our esophagus. Same thing happens with your blood vessels. And when ACE2 fires off when it gets activated, it causes contraction of parasites and blocks these micro vessels. And if you get stagnant blood in blood vessels, it clots like that. It’s what it does. Okay. It’s a normal homeostatic mechanisms. So there’s that there’s the effects on the local tissue. And there is direct effects triggering coagulation through a number of pathways. Now, what can cause myocarditis pericarditis? A number of things. Autoimmune processes, which we also know are involved in some of the coagulation problems. And this kind of process of clamping down on blood vessels, which we know is happening.
Joe Rogan1:46:10In the autoimmune response, is this also in response to the spike protein? What is causing the autoimmune response in people?
Dr. Robert Malone1:46:15It’s observed that it is happening and it’s happening with these RNA vaccines. It’s happening with the adenoviral vector vaccines. I don’t recall literature that it’s happening with the virus itself, but it may very well be.
Joe Rogan1:46:34I know quite a few people that have had viral outbreaks post, like things like shingles or herpes outbreaks.
Dr. Robert Malone1:46:42That’s another one. Okay. So now you’re opening the compartment. Before we were talking about cardiac and blood vessels.
Joe Rogan1:46:49Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone1:46:49And we talked a little bit about the brain. We didn’t talk about the strokes. We talked about the brain fog, and it’s known that spike will open the blood brain barrier is this kind of concept. It’s a little loose, but it has to do with the structure of the cells that line the blood vessels in your brain and what it allows to go through and doesn’t go through. Spike causes that to become more like an open sieve, so things can go into your brain that shouldn’t go into your brain so that can trigger brain inflammation. And that is the risk that people like Luc Montagnier are concerned about with neurofibrillary tangles. And that’s why they talked about prions or Alzheimer’s like symptoms. That’s part of what happens when brain gets inflammation, because it’s got stuff going on in there that it’s not supposed to have.
Joe Rogan1:47:43Hence the brain fog.
Dr. Robert Malone1:47:45The brain fog could be due to microvascular blockade. It could be due to this clamping of blood vessels that I was talking about. It could be due to leaky blood vessels that’s the blood brain barrier breaching. Hard to say, multifactorial. All we know is that it’s happening.
Joe Rogan1:48:03And that’s also something that’s happening to people with COVID as well.
Dr. Robert Malone1:48:06Correct. I’ve experienced it myself when I had, when I wasn’t sick. And not only brain fog, you can remember broadcaster Cuomo when he had Covid. He was talking about seeing Hallucinations. That is a common consequence of primary Covid infection is not just brain fog, but overt hallucinations.
Joe Rogan1:48:33Now, after the vaccines started to be administered, it was a couple of months later. I believe that the Salk Institute published their paper on spike proteins.
Dr. Robert Malone1:48:43Right. And I cited that in the Brett Weinstein Dark Horse podcast and was immediately attacked by Reuters for spreading disinformation because I was speaking that the spike protein was a toxin and that’s one of many papers that have come out since then or before. And I didn’t say the spike protein on the vaccine. I said the spike protein and Reuters basically took my words, twisted them and then attacked me about it.
Joe Rogan1:49:16Is the spike protein in the vaccine different than the spike protein in the virus?
Dr. Robert Malone1:49:21The answer is yes. In a way that matters is the question. So the difference is now we’re going to get into molecular Virology. I’m sorry, but you asked the question. So Spike kind of you can think of it as having a stem part and a head group. You can point to your tie if you want these things sticking out here. But I wanted to illustrate that it also has this little it’s like catchers glove that sits on top. That is the receptor binding domain. So it’s got these elements that are really important to understand it. And this part of the spike protein that is kind of straight and thin. The stalk is responsible for the business part of what spike does. Spike causes fusion between the virus and the cell. It’s what enables the virus to infect the cell. And it’s a complex set of events, and it changes its structure as it goes through this. It’s fascinating stuff. If you’re into this, okay, you can lock it into the prefusion confirmation. You can make it so that it will not trigger cell fusion after binding with two little tiny mutations, substituting proline in the S2 domain, and that’ll make it so that it can never trigger fusion, which is one of the things that it can do to bake toxicity. That has nothing to do with whether or not it can bind ACE2 up here, whether or not that catchers MIT will grab onto ACE2. By the way, spike exists as a trimer, like a treble hook on a fishing lure. So these two mutations are in this S two domain. That’s kind of the stem, and it makes it so that it can’t fuse. And that’s what’s in the vaccine. But the rest of the spike is the natural spike. And, yes, it does get cut off, and it does go into circulation. That’s all been proven. And so what matters about that is all the things I’ve been talking about about spike interacting with ACE2 and turning on ACE2 that can all still happen. None of that’s changed. Now, one of the attacks made against my saying this is, oh, they engineered spike so that it’s nontoxic. Okay, that fails two tests. Number one at the time they did this engineering. I’ve carefully reviewed the papers. It’s all about making it more immunogenic. There is nothing in there about making it less toxic. And by definition, it will make it less toxic as a fusion protein. But it won’t do anything about other parts of spike in its activities. Then there is this fundamental logic flaw in clinical development and nonclinical development and safety and pharmacology, I like to say the French judicial system applies. What that is, is, you’re guilty until proven innocent. It’s the job of the pharmaceutical companies to prove that their engineered spike is safe. They never did that. And so all of this pressure that comes back from folks like me saying, hey, this isn’t right, okay? And it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck. It’s probably toxic because it’s the common variable. I get criticized because, oh, well, prove that it’s not safe. I’m sorry. That’s not the way it works. It’s pharma’s job to prove that it is safe. Not my job to prove that it’s not safe. I’m observing the safety signal. The safety signal is there. It is associated with vectors that express spike, whether it’s the vaccine, the virus or the adenovirus, you know, the mRNA, the virus itself or the adenoviral vector spike, those toxicities are there. And the common variable is the spike protein. And the comment, “well, it’s not a toxin”. I’m kind of in the forest Gump school of toxicity. If it causes toxicity, it is right, it is a toxin. By definition, toxin is as a toxin does. We can argue about the meaning of toxin. Just like so much of the rest of our language has been perverted during this. But a simple explanation. The simple definition is, does it cause toxicity in people? I think the answer is pretty clear now it does. The question that we’re arguing about is how often and how bad this is the question.
Joe Rogan1:54:23So why do so many people take the vaccine and have no adverse effect at all?
Dr. Robert Malone1:54:29Great question. And that is a normal situation in any drug. We talk about. Bell curves. There’s a response curve. Humans are genetically complex and they’re phenotypically complex. I am not a jujitsu champion, right? I am not the same body mass index as I was when I was 25. It seems that the common factor across many people that get both the vaccine adverse events and the disease. And by the way, there’s a great paper out that tried to dissect long COVID and differentiate it from post vaccination syndrome, which is what we’re talking about. And they did statistical analysis, large cohort of patients. Basically, they’re indistinguishable. Long COVID and post vaccination syndrome in terms of the spectrum of the syndrome, their incidence, that kind of stuff. They’re indistinguishable the same thing. So, why? One of the factors that seems to be common is this kind of hyperglycemic index? People that are not necessarily diabetic, but they may be prediabetic or they have problems with carbohydrate metabolism or they’re eating too many sugars or whatever the thing is. So they’ve got elevated hemoglobin H1C. People that have high glycemic indices seem to be particularly susceptible to these effects. Now, that is a syndrome associated with an inflammatory state in blood vessels. So, what you’re asking again and again, because you are who you are, is in plain language, the big picture issues that are sitting out there that haven’t been adequately addressed.
Joe Rogan1:56:33Not only haven’t been adequately addressed, but when you do address them, you get demonized. Even if you’re just asking questions as far as, like, what are the numbers? What is the data? Where can I see this data?
Dr. Robert Malone1:56:45If you’re an academic, you get run out. I don’t want to avoid, you talked about some of the other adverse events, and you started talking about the ones that relate to immune response.
Joe Rogan1:56:58Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone1:56:59And that is the tip of the iceberg that most people are familiar with is the common, CDC never talks about it, but it’s clearly there in the literature in places, even New England Journal of Medicine, it’s clearly there in the VAERS database is latent virus reactivation. And the most obvious one is shingles. If you get shingles, I’ve had shingles, it hurts. You don’t miss it when you get it. But Epstein-Barr virus, other herpes viruses, cytomegalovirus. What do these all in common? They’re latent DNA viruses. Okay, so what latent DNA viruses? Well, we have a bunch of DNA viruses that basically hide inside our body, and they are kept suppressed. As a matter of fact, there’s a whole thread in vaccinology. We talk about immunosenescence, the aging of the immune system. Part of that has to do with the thymus, and it’s shrinking. That’s what educates T-cells. By the way, that’s one of the reasons why children basically shrug this disease off is they haven’t had that thymic in pollution. But one of the things that happens is your T-cells become increasingly focused on suppressing the DNA viruses that we’ve all been parasitized by, like, cytomegalovirus. And so you can watch over time the diversity of T cells in person’s body who’s infected by CMV over time. As they get older and older, their T cells get more and more and more focused on just trying to keep CMV in the box and not let it out. So when we see DNA viruses, Pandora’s box is opening and they’re jumping out of there. Okay, well, the thing that keeps Pandora’s box closed, is T cell responses. And then we have, I hope someday you get a chance to have Ryan Cole on, pathologist, deep understanding of this. As he points out, he’s seeing referrals from oncologists of cancers that are unusual. They’re occurring early. They’re behaving irregularly. They’re behaving very aggressively. Now right now, this is still anecdotal, I don’t want to get the audience all wound up. “We’re all going to die of cancer”. Dr. Malone is not saying we’re all going to die of cancer. Okay, but this is another of those little, uh-ohs, because the thing that keeps cancer suppressed is T cells. Then we have the laboratory data that we’re seeing abnormalities in the key signaling molecules that T cells use to talk to each other, toll-like receptors that are associated in, particularly with the mRNA vaccines. So something is happening. Okay, that is causing release of T cell suppression, reactivation of latent DNA viruses, maybe some signals relating to oncology, some changes in T cell signaling behavior. And then there’s this increasing awareness that there’s some window of time, not sure how long after vaccination, when you’re actually more susceptible to infection. And this may have something to do. So not only is the vaccine efficacy waning, but the multiple jab strategy is actually creating more and more windows where people have this period of T-cell suppression. So there’s a whole lot in this box of immunology. And what are the jabs doing to our immune system and how long does it last? That is, let’s say gently, a little worrisome to some of us that have a background in these things.
Joe Rogan2:00:54This T cell suppression. Are there any studies on the amount of time that it takes before your system rebalances itself post jab. Is it accumulative? Like, if you’re dealing with three shots or four shots?
Dr. Robert Malone2:01:12I’m sorry. This is the obscenity for me of this whole, “Well, we’re going to give four shots because we don’t really know and we know we need to do something”. I like to talk about the metaphor as a father, I don’t know if you’ve had kids. I’m a grandfather. You give a three year old a hammer and everything becomes a nail.
Joe Rogan2:01:33Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone2:01:33Okay. That’s kind of a simple way of saying people that aren’t well trained, given a powerful technology or tool will abuse it and overuse it. In this case, there’s multiple reasons not to do the multiple jobs. The simplest one for everybody to understand is when your son develops seasonal allergies to ragweed pollen or whatever. And it’s so bad that he can’t go to school. His eyes are running, he can’t play in sports, whatever you’re like. Oh, we got to do something about this. I’m going to take him to rheumatologist an allergist and see what they can do. Well, they do a bunch of tests and they say, oh, your son is allergic to ragweed pollen or whatever the thing is, what do they do? Well, they give him shots. One of those shots, they’re high doses of antigen that are administered repeatedly to your child. And what it does is induces something that is immunologist we call high zone tolerance. High zone tolerance basically amounts to an ability by giving multiple injections at high levels of antigen to shut down T cells against in an antigen specific fashion. So, there’s that. The other thing with the multiple jabs is that these are multiple jabs that are mismatched. They don’t fit.
Joe Rogan2:02:58Can I pause you for a second before you continue. So you’re saying that if someone is allergic to things and they go to an allergy and they start getting shots, those shots shut down T cell response?
Dr. Robert Malone2:03:10Correct.
Joe Rogan2:03:11So those shots by doing so and shutting down T cell response, the idea is that it kicks your immune system in and it’s supposed to fight off these things?
Dr. Robert Malone2:03:18No
Joe Rogan2:03:19Does it make you more vulnerable to other diseases?
Dr. Robert Malone2:03:22Because they’re using that antigen, the ragweed pollen, it’s causing deletion or down regulation of the T memory population responsible for responding to ragweed pollen. So what it’s doing is selectively shutting down the T response against that antigen.
Joe Rogan2:03:42But what about everything else?
Dr. Robert Malone2:03:44No, it won’t affect it. No, I won’t say it won’t affect it. But the effect on the overall immune response is negligible in that this is done clinically routinely. So there’s those two things. There’s the short term issue. We don’t know how long it lasts. There’s the high zone tolerance issue. And then there is with the multiple jabs that are mismatched for the current circulating virus that’s akin to repeatedly taking a flu vaccine from two seasons ago and hoping it’s going to protect against this flu.
Joe Rogan2:04:21Well, that’s one of the most confusing things about this push for people to get boosted now with Omicron, because they keep saying with Omicron, we need to get but that’s a vaccine escape variant, isn’t it?
Dr. Robert Malone2:04:35Yeah. Among other things, do you want to open that can of Omicron?
Joe Rogan2:04:42What we know so far is at least Peter McCullough said this. And I believe several other people have said this as well. That the immunity that you may have had to the Alpha variant or the Delta variant. It does not seem to work very well against Omicron.
Dr. Robert Malone2:04:59That’s true.
Joe Rogan2:05:00Nor does the immunity imparted by vaccines.
Dr. Robert Malone2:05:03By the way, since we’re down this little rabbit hole, let me just say one thing. Peter called me and he said, Robert, make sure you talk to Joe and make it clear that although I spoke clearly and forcefully about one and done when I was on his show, that was before Omicron.
Joe Rogan2:05:20Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone2:05:21And so Peter wanted me to make sure that your audience knew.
Joe Rogan2:05:24Yes, we’ve actually talked about that because I have several friends right now that have tested positive for COVID for a second time. And that is post that podcast with him. He was pretty sure that if you got Delta, you would never get it again. But I know people that have had honestly, I don’t know anybody who had Delta, which was the last phase. I know people who had the original version of COVID who have now gotten Omicron.
Dr. Robert Malone2:05:51In my case, I had the original Wuhan strain, and I got infected with Delta, and I had disease for about three days. And that’s after taking to the two jabs.
Joe Rogan2:06:01Wow. And then how far after taking the two jabs was it about four months? Four months?
Dr. Robert Malone2:06:08Yes. Four or five months.
Joe Rogan2:06:08So that’s still inside the window of efficacy.
Dr. Robert Malone2:06:11That window of efficacy seems to keep shrinking. So that’s another thing.
Joe Rogan2:06:17Well, that is another thing. When you were vaccinated post your infection, how long after your infection were you vaccinated?
Dr Robert Malone2:06:26Oh.
Joe Rogan2:06:27So you’re infected by COVID early on. Okay.
Dr. Robert Malone2:06:30Like 9 months.
Joe Rogan2:06:329 months, ok. But you still had a horrible reaction to it?
Dr. Robert Malone2:06:35Totally.
Joe Rogan2:06:36And then even that, this is pure speculation, the waning efficacy of the vaccine. Does that have an effect on your natural immunity, the natural immunity that you’ve had?
Dr. Robert Malone2:06:55So you’re now opening up the big can of whoop ass.
Joe Rogan2:06:57Is that ADE?
Dr. Robert Malone2:07:00ADE. So that’s a whole other rabbit hole. And I like to call it vaccine enhanced infection or disease, because ADE is just one subset of that.
Joe Rogan2:07:08Okay.
Dr. Robert Malone2:07:08But there is signs in some data, and we were talking about this just before the broadcast from Denmark, among other places of negative efficacy against Omicron as a function of the number of vaccinations up to three. So negative efficacy. Positive efficacy means it protects you. Negative efficacy means your probability of being infected is higher if you’ve taken the vaccine and it’s compared to unvaccinated, it seems to be somewhat higher if you’ve had one jab, even worse, even more likely to get infected if you’ve had two jobs, even more likely to get infected if you had three jobs. Now don’t jump straight to ADE, because the problem, just to illustrate this confounding variable problem, which is what all the statisticians argue about endlessly, is that there are all kinds of things that can complicate this interpretation. I’m going to give you the simple one. If somebody feels that they’re fully vaccine and they’re living their young person in Denmark or whatever in Europe, they’re more likely to go engage in risky behaviors, such as maybe they’re going to go out clubbing. Whereas before they may have said no, I’m not going to go out clubbing. Are you crazy now? They feel like they’re Superman. They’ve got a shield. And so they engage in more risky behaviors. And so there’s an example of a confounding variable, one of many I want to caution that I’m not saying that this shows that we’re having vaccine enhanced infection. I’m saying that this is a risk which the FDA knew about explicitly identified told the vaccine manufacturers they should set up studies to detect whether or not it’s happening, but didn’t force them to do it. This is another one of the huge FDA fails here. They have the right and responsibility to ensure that we had good data about this. And they took a pass. They said, vaccine manufacturer, we think you should do this, but it’s optional. And so they never did. It no surprise that’s the first rule of clinical development, when you’re in big Pharma, you never ask a question that you don’t want to know the answer to unless you’re absolutely forced to do it. That’s why the FDA is supposed to do its job. But in this case, with enhanced disease, a known risk of all prior coronavirus vaccine development efforts, including veterinary, chronic complication with those efforts. The reason why I focused on drug repurposing instead of vaccine development at the start of the outbreak, when I got the call from Michael Callahan, I said, past history ADE, this is going to take a long time. We’re going to need drugs. Best way we can get drugs is drug repurposing. Yay. Then I got my team to focus on that. That’s why we did that. So, FDA has known that this is a risk. All the vaccinologists know it’s a risk. It’s in the literature. We’ve all been kind of watching carefully, at least I have. Is this risk going to manifest?
Joe Rogan2:10:39Can I pause you for a second when you’re saying statistically, it seems that one jab makes you more likely to get Omicron than unvaccinated, two jabs, even more so. Three jabs more. So where is this data?
Dr. Robert Malone2:10:57It’s coming. It’s a series of analyses. There’s a really active group of biostatisticians worldwide now that are picking apart the primary data that’s coming out. There was a paper that was published from the Netherlands, as I recall, that had or it was an official publication by the government that had the primary data. And then this primary data has been analyzed, reanalyzed discussed on substact, blah, blah, blah, torn apart and rebuilt. Now we put out a substack statement that summarizes some of this that you can easily find from us. But it’s an ongoing debate. But the effect size. Now, what the statisticians are arguing about is whether or not they had the right number for the denominator of total cases. This gets back to my point that the databases are all contaminated because the incidence of the virus in the population is a function of testing. In other words, you don’t look for it, you don’t see it. Then you assume you’re not having it right. And in the Netherlands, they have one of the best testing systems. So they have been rigorously testing everybody for whether or not they’re getting the virus. And so those numbers are a little sketchy. And that’s what everybody’s arguing about is should we be looking at only the twelve and above cohort? But the effect size is so large that we can argue about these confounding variables until the cows come home. But it’s a big effect. It’s going to be hard to account for otherwise. It is not in peer reviewed publications. This kind of stuff is wicked hard to publish these days, and it takes months.
Joe Rogan2:12:51So would the assumption be that there’s something that’s happening to people that are vaccinated, where it makes them more susceptible to this particular strain of COVID? Because this particular strain of COVID, this Omicron is a vaccine escaped variant, meaning that it sort of tried to find its way around the protection of the vaccine and selected for that?
Dr. Robert Malone2:13:14So now you’re trying to impose, what you’re doing is generating a hypothesis, which is good. And one of many possible hypotheses. And so in a world a proper world where we are allowed to debate these things and do these kinds of studies and examine these kinds of variables without being (makes a slashed motion to throat) in social media, we would have a very active discussion about this hypothesis and many others. Now, that’s my way of not answering your question.
Joe Rogan2:13:48I understand. Well, is there a mechanism that would point to one of two things whether it is a decrease in immune response of a person who’s been vaccinated or some opportunities….
Dr. Robert Malone2:14:04Let me go down the rabbit hole of that first comment you made. Okay, so what we’re doing is with administering a mismatched vaccine, is we’re driving the effector in memory cells, B and T, towards a population that is focused on a virus that no longer exists. In immune response, you don’t get everything. And with what I think you didn’t ask me the question, but I’m going to answer it anyhow. What is your hypothesis for the poor durability of the vaccines? My answer is it looks to me like original antigenic sin. Well, that’s kind of a cool terminology. What that means, let’s unpack original antigenic sin. And I think what could be happening with these data as you’re just following your hypothesis you just shared, consistent with that is that we’re driving the immune response towards responding to an antigen. The receptor binding domain of spike that no longer exists, with Omicron. Now it has become clear, it was initially denied, but it’s become clear that all of us have a background immune response against beta coronaviruses. These are naturally circulating cold coronaviruses that have significant immunologic cross reactivity with SARS-CoV-2. And the problem with that in original antigenic sin is that those existing memory cells will dominate the immune response when you get infected, and when you get vaccinated. Now let me unpack that in a way that kind of makes sense for the common person. We all know that…well in war, the homily is we’re always best prepared for the last war. In your life, the sum of your prior life experiences biases how you respond to, I mean, in your martial arts, you must know this, right? Deeply, what you’ve experienced in the past in prior fights is going to bias how you respond to a new opponent. Okay. Same happens with your immune system. Does that make sense?
Joe Rogan2:16:35Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone2:16:36Okay. Super, you now understand original antigenic sin, because the prior exposure of your immune system to an antigen that is closely related to a new antigen. If you are having martial art competition with a person of a certain ethnic background or physical characteristics or whatever, and they have certain strategies that they use, the next time you encounter somebody that looks like that and seems to move like that, you’re going to say, oh, they’re going to use the same kind of strategies. Your immune system acts the same way with viruses, and it could be that they’ve got a whole different toolkit and you’re busy fighting this war, and they come in and, boom, you’re dead, right? Same kind of thing. So we’ve got a new pathogen, but it’s got a series of overlaps with the old ones that we’ve seen before. And our immune system is biased to respond as if it’s the old one. Now, to make matters worse, we’re taking the spike protein. Only one of the proteins, the dominant immunologically dominant protein. And we’re jabbing everybody multiple times and driving memory cells and effector cells that are to a virus that is not the one we’re encountering. So it could very well be that as you’re taking more jabs, you’re further skewing your immune response in a way that’s dysfunctional for infection to Omicron compared to somebody that is immunologically naive, they only have presumably they’ve either recovered from an earlier, because we got to remember the baseline group, the non-vaccinated group is actually complicated because it’s got those that haven’t had the virus before, but they’ve had beta coronaviruses and those that have had prior infection and are naturally immune. So you can appreciate that looking at these things kind of get squirrely. There’s a lot of moving parts, but when you see a signal this strong, it’s saying something’s going on. You ought to pay attention to it. In my opinion.
Joe Rogan2:18:54What is the difference between the spike protein that’s generated from the injection of the vaccine versus all of the variables that your body encounters when it’s been infected by COVID.
Dr. Robert Malone2:19:10That is another brilliant question. I’m not saying this to butter you up and thank you for asking it. So it was a very broad question, and this is a peal the onions, onion layers situation. I mean, you said, what are the differences? Let’s start at a high level when you get infected or I get infected, it’s typically nasal or oral pharynx. It’s coming in through the mucosal membranes of your head. Okay. And by the way, that’s one of the other things that’s kind of cool about Omicron in a good way is that the prior strains infect mostly deep lung. And there’s really fascinating data from Hong Kong suggesting that Omicron is infecting upper airway more. That is a characteristic of less pathogenic influenza viruses. And hopefully, what we know about Omicron is even though it’s more infectious and replicates the higher levels, it’s less pathogenic. It’s a paradox. Well, that could explain it. Okay. So there may be some good news in Omicron. But getting back to your question, when you take the jab, you get a, I don’t know how to say this, a spike. You get a bolus, a peak fairly rapidly of this viral protein, and it’s in your body and it’s circulating in your blood. We know that, there’s a Harvard study, Brigham and Woman’s nurses spike protein circulation after vaccination.
Joe Rogan2:20:49Can I pause you one second? When you test for COVID, you go in through the nose. If someone is getting Omicron, are they less likely to test positive because you’re swabbing their nose?
Dr. Robert Malone2:21:05More. No.
Joe Rogan2:21:06More.
Dr. Robert Malone2:21:07All of these are initially coming in here.
Joe Rogan2:21:10So it still would exist in the nose, even though it’s affecting the back of the throat.
Dr. Robert Malone2:21:14Well, it’s clearly producing equal or higher levels. Delta was significantly higher in the nose by PCR, with all of the caveats about the problems with that cycle number. And Omicron seems to be even higher, significantly higher.
Joe Rogan2:21:31Okay.
Dr. Robert Malone2:21:33So, hits your nose, and then it goes down.
Joe Rogan2:21:36And it’s affecting the throat. For some reason, a lot of the people that I know that got Omicron had a throat ache, a soreness of the throat before.
Dr. Robert Malone2:21:44That is paradoxically, really good news. By the way, that’s called primary data, anecdotal primary data. But it beats modeling data from the CDC, which is what the New York Times has been reporting that we’re all have. By this point, we’re all supposed to have 70 or 80% of all the virus in the United States is supposed to be Omicron. That is based on what is now known to be erroneous modeling. And all of us that were inside, when we saw this come out, we knew the group in the UK that did the modeling, and we were like, oh, these guys have over promised. They have basically put out scare modeling all the way through this outbreak, and we should take this with a grain of salt. And now the press is all backpedaling and the CDC is backpedaling saying, I think we got it wrong. And there’s still a lot of Delta in the population. But your buddies, if it’s circulating here in Austin and you’re hearing people are having more of the sore throat and runny nose and less of my chest is burning and I’ve lost taste and smell.
Unknown2:22:49Right.
Dr. Robert Malone2:22:51Just to kind of open that up a little bit, with H1N1 influenza. Just to take one example, we have high pathogenicity and low pathogenicity versions of H1N1. What that means is some of them will kill you and some of them won’t, more or less. The difference seems to be the virus, the nuances of the receptor that the virus is hitting and using to initially infect cells and the low pathogenicity H1N1s infect the upper airway and the high pathogenicity H1N1s infect the deep lung. The prior SARS-CoV-1s have been hitting deep lung. So, this report that you’re giving me from your buddies that you think is probably Omicron, is consistent with the Hong Kong data, and it all fits into a box. And we know from South Africa for sure, that Omicron, and the WHO made the statement there are no known deaths associated with Omicron in the world. Now, there may be a couple somewhere.
Joe Rogan2:24:02I thought it was just the United States. I didn’t know the thing for the world. Yes, because we just read something that said there were several that were associated.
Dr. Robert Malone2:24:11Now, as I said, over time, there will be deaths associated. Remember, we talked about the difference between causal and association.
Joe Rogan2:24:20Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone2:24:21Okay.
Joe Rogan2:24:21And also the fact that 95% of the people who have died from COVID had an average of four comorbidities.
Dr. Robert Malone2:24:27You’re on it. And now it’s been documented at least two cases when they were reported deaths from Omicron and people actually went back. They got picked up in the legacy media and circulated as, oh, my God, it’s going to kill us again. More fear porn. Then people went again like they did with the Ivermectin story. Remember about the hospital? It was all full of Ivermectin toxicity, and then someone bothered to call the hospital. Same story. Sorry. No, those weren’t Omicron deaths, just something that got reported and amplified in the legacy media. So regardless, the mortality of Omicron is remarkably low. I think we can all agree on that.
Joe Rogan2:25:11It’s essentially like a cold.
Dr. Robert Malone2:25:14The list of symptoms from Omicron published in Nature, I think recently are pretty much 100% overlap with common cold.
Joe Rogan2:25:23And there are coronaviruses that are common colds.
Dr. Robert Malone2:25:26That’s the beta coronaviruses that I was talking about when I was talking about original antigenic sin.
Joe Rogan2:25:30So if you test positive for the common cold, do you test positive for a coronavirus?
Dr. Robert Malone2:25:36Like, if you take a COVID test the common cold generally, that’s not too cold.
Joe Rogan2:25:42Not common.
Dr. Robert Malone2:25:43No, it’s a grab bag of stuff, right.
Joe Rogan2:25:46Okay.
Dr. Robert Malone2:25:47It’s rhino viruses. It’s coronaviruses, it’s influenza. It’s a lot of things. There’s a lot of respiratory viruses that are floating around, but getting back on track with Omicron, it is absolutely looking like Omicron is a mild variant. It is absolutely able to escape prior vaccination. The control of prior vaccination, typically with mismatched vaccine. It seems to be also able to infect a subset of people that are naturally immune, probably less than the subset that get infected with vaccination. But this is a kind of a key message to your audience. The reproductive coefficient. That’s more fancy language, the reproductive coefficient. But many of your audience is going to know that, that’s the R-naught. The R-naught of the original strain Wuhan strain was about two to three. That means that if I’m infected on average, without any other interventions, I’ll infect two to three other people. And for Delta, the R-naught was more in the range of five to six. If I’m infected, no vaccination, no social distancing, no masking, blah, blah, blah. The average rate of transmission would be I would infect five or six people. In the case of Omicron, the R-naught, the base reproduction coefficient is in the range of seven to ten. Okay, that is a wicked high. That is measles territory. What that means, I’m going to translate that into simple language, we are all going to get infected. Whether you use masks or not, use social distancing or not. Unless you’re going to go live on the Muir trail and not talk to anybody when you pass them, you’re going to get infected. So this gets to the key point. Find a doc that will administer early treatments and you know what they are. And you just had the expert on.
Joe Rogan2:28:01Now it’s incredibly difficult to get the stuff now, that’s what’s incredible.
Dr. Robert Malone2:28:05And then as if that isn’t bad enough, we’ve got the federal government monking around with availability of the monoclonal antibodies.
Joe Rogan2:28:15That was the next thing I was going to ask you about. Why would they do that? What is the percentage of Delta versus Omicron out there? And how do we know?
Dr. Robert Malone2:28:24I just alluded to that a minute ago, and this is another fascinating story, and it’s kind of being covered up. It’s starting to be covered by the press, but they’re not going back to the cause. Okay. Remember I said that there was a group in the UK Imperial College, didn’t give the specifics before, but there’s a group in the UK that does modeling, and they came out with some modeling projections that basically the entire UK hospital system was going to be inundated with Omicron shortly, basically Christmas time. And a lot of us looked at that and went, yeah, those are the same guys that have predicted that we’re going to have millions and millions and millions of dead, and they’re going to be bodies stacked up and coolers in the UK, and it sure looks like they may have overshot again. The CDC seems to have taken those modeling projections and those models and they put out, you remember, in mid December, right before Christmas, Merry Christmas. Oh, you’re all going to get infected by COVID, and it’s going to sweep through. And we’re going to have 80% of COVID by this time of this month.
Joe Rogan2:29:31Well, how about that ridiculous press release from the White House that said, we’re the winter of the unvaccinated death, you experience a winter of death and overwhelming hospitalizations.
Dr. Robert Malone2:29:45All I can say is that the political genius behind that should be taken out behind in the woodshed and given a good whooping, because that was just horrible political messaging.
Joe Rogan2:29:56So horrible, and in terms of Omicron, so inaccurate.
Dr. Robert Malone2:30:00Yeah, but it doesn’t matter. That’s the core thing of this chronic angst of what the heck is going on. This doesn’t make any sense at all. I don’t want to get too off your topic, but our government is out of control on this, and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule. They have broken all the rules that I know of that I’ve been trained on for years and years and years. These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg Code. They’re explicitly inconsistent with the Belmont Report. They are flat out illegal and they don’t care. And the only thing standing between us, and it’s too late for many of our colleagues, including the unfortunate colleagues in the DoD. Hopefully we’re going to be able to stop them before they take our kids.
Joe Rogan2:31:11What’s wrong? What do you mean by the DoD.
Dr. Robert Malone2:31:13The mandated vaccines.
Joe Rogan2:31:15The mandated vaccines for everyone in the DoD?
Dr. Robert Malone2:31:17Yeah. So, what’s going on in the White House is a whole another hour’s talk.
Joe Rogan2:31:28Yeah, I’m sure it is. Back to Omicron and Delta. How do we know when you get tested, like when I was tested and I came up positive for COVID I have no idea what I got. I assume it was Delta because that’s what I’d heard was going around. But when they released these numbers, where are they getting that data from?
Dr. Robert Malone2:31:48So, in terms of this specific one, I’m sorry. I got off track. We’re talking about Imperial College modeling, and the CDC seemed to picked up on that and the last data they had, it’s actually, Peter, that sent me the data. We did a podcast about it. So he sent me the modeling data, and he sent me the documentation that the modeling data that the CDC was putting out in The New York Times and the press and all amplified when we all said, oh, we’re going to have 70 or 80% Omicron in the population by this time of this year. The only actual data they had was up to about December 4, as I recall. And it showed only a tiny fraction of Omicron in the population. But then they applied their mathematical models that they apparently got from Imperial College. And they said, oh, the curve is going to look like this. And therefore, that’s where we’re going to be at this point in time. And therefore we’re going to have 70% infection. And the press all picked it up. And they just assumed that that was based on real data, not modeled data. What I’m hearing from docs in the field again and again, I had a bunch of people call me before I came on your show. Everybody was like, Robert, say this to Joe, but you’re so important that everybody wants to get their angle in. But what I’m hearing in the field is that Delta is still dominant. And these are hospitalists and people treating disease. And so they’re seeing a skewed population. But it’s important to remember that when the CDC says those kinds of numbers, they’re talking about incidents, that is the moment, how many have actually been infected at that slice of time. But what you see in the hospitals, and this is something the press misses all the time. So they do like you’re hearing all this fear porn about how the hospitals have filled up in New York City and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay, Omicron causes a short term limited illness. Delta is wicked bad, and it puts you in the hospital. When it puts you in the hospital, you can be there for a month to two months. What you’re seeing in hospitalized cases right now appears to be dominantly Delta, because the CDC overestimated the fraction of the population that, they overestimated, how aggressively Omicron was going to move into the US population. Maybe that means our social distancing and masking is working. I don’t know, but it’s not moving in as fast as they had been projecting. And the bulk of the disease that the doctors that I’m talking to are seeing in hospitals appears to be Delta.
Joe Rogan2:34:36Wouldn’t that be because the people that are catching Delta are the ones that need to be hospitalized, the people that are catching Omicron that don’t need.
Dr. Robert Malone2:34:44Precisely. But here’s the rub. And I’m looping back now to your antibody. Point is the geniuses in our public health system said, Omicron, based on this modeling data is going to be moving into the population. It’s going to dominate things. We need to pull the monoclonals that are Delta specific and only allow people to use the monoclonals that are Omicron specific because it’s going to drive further evolution otherwise, I guess that’s their logic.
Joe Rogan2:35:15But I haven’t heard that logic at all. All I’ve heard is that the monoclonal antibodies are ineffective against Omicron.
Dr. Robert Malone2:35:22You’re saying the same thing.
Joe Rogan2:35:24But I’ve never seen any data that the monoclonal Where’s that at it’s in peer reviewed literature. Now that is ineffective against Omaha’s.
Dr. Robert Malone2:35:26There are data. There are data. That the…
Joe Rogn2:35:28Where is that at?
Dr. Robert Malone2:35:29It’s in peer reviewed literature now.
Joe Rogan2:35:32That it’s ineffective against Omicron.
Dr. Robert Malone2:35:33I wouldn’t say ineffective, less effective based on laboratory neutralization assays.
Joe Rogan2:35:38So in vitro?
Dr. Robert Malone2:35:40Correct.
Joe Rogan2:35:41Okay.
Dr. Robert Malone2:35:42So, Joe Ladipo, surgeon general in the state of Florida, has put out public statements now on. I think it’s Twitter, among other things, saying, decrying what the federal government has done of pulling all of the regular monoclonals. What I’m hearing from frontline docs is those older regeneron monoclonals, etc, are still very effective in their hospitalized population. Presumably because it’s still predominantly Delta, and yet they’re no longer able to get it.
Joe Rogan2:36:17So the government has literally stopped the distribution of medicine, effective medicine, for a disease that exists currently. When has that ever happened before?
Dr. Robert Malone2:36:29Hydroxychloroquin and Ivermectin.
Joe Rogan2:36:31Yeah, but in this level, hydroxychloroquin and Ivermectin were off label uses. This is something that has emergency use authorization.
Dr. Robert Malone2:36:43Unlabeled. Yeah.
Joe Rogan2:36:44This is wild.
Dr. Robert Malone2:36:47Are they brain dead?
Joe Rogan2:36:48Are they trying to just encourage vaccination? Is that what all it is? Is this a money grab?
Dr. Robert Malone2:36:55Okay.
Joe Rogan2:36:56What is that?
Dr. Robert Malone2:36:56So here’s another version. When you see this kind of decoupling of public policy from logic, then it causes thinking people like yourself to say, what the hell is going on here, right? And then we go down the rabbit hole. Is at this, that or the other thing? One of the things in that spectrum of what’s going on is that the emergency use authorizations are predicated on policy determinations that were in a state of emergency. Those are now two years old. They’re expiring. I’m not saying this is what’s going on in their head. But there is another perverse incentive here to amplify the fair porn and to amplify, if you buy into the hypothesis that for some reason there are incentives for the government to maintain the state of emergency, that is one explanation, given that those declarations are expiring and will have to be reimplemented. Because if they’re not, then all of this emergency use authorization vanishes like dust.
Joe Rogan2:38:28So are you saying, are you implying, that perhaps one of the reasons why they’re removing monoclonal antibodies is to enhance the amount of people that are sick?
Dr. Robert Malone2:38:40I’m saying it is in the spectrum of the range of possible, just the same as the withholding of early treatments is inexplicable.
Joe Rogan2:38:50And this is inexplicable in that we know that they’re very effective. I have personal evidence that they’re very effective. They worked great on me. The fact that they are removing this and that you would even consider that the reason why they’re doing it is to extend the emergency use authorization…
Dr. Robert Malone2:39:07For political reasons.
Joe Rogan2:39:08That’s insane. That’s terrifying.
Dr. Robert Malone2:39:11It’s hard for me to reconcile the behavior of the government and its public health decisions with the data. It’s like there’s two bins. Is it incompetence or is it malefeasance? Is there some ulterior political motive, or are they just dumb stupid?
Joe Rogan2:39:40If there’s some political motive, if that’s written anywhere, someone’s going to jail. I mean, if that comes out, if that’s somehow or another gets leaked? Jesus fu***** Christ. That’s scary.
Dr. Robert Malone2:39:54I wish it was so.
Joe Rogan2:39:55So I wish it was so too. I’m saying that and I might be completely wrong. Totally naive.
Dr. Robert Malone2:40:01But the lab leak.
Joe Rogan2:40:02Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone2:40:05For me, the disclosure of emails that Cliff Lane, Tony Fauci and Francis Collins actively conspired to destroy any discussion of the appropriateness of lockdown strategies and in the mainstream press hardly covers it. And there are no consequences. The document trail having to do with the gain of function research and the implication of NIH. And by the way, DTRA, in that having absolutely no consequences for anybody. We’re in an environment in which truth and consequences are fungible. This is modern media management and warfare. The truth is what those that are managing the Trusted News Initiative say it is.
Joe Rogan2:41:08That is wild. And for me personally, it’s so confusing that I find myself in a situation where I feel compelled to have people like you on because I don’t know where else this is going to get out.
Dr. Robert Malone2:41:26Thank you. On behalf of, in my case, I’m the President of the International Alliance of Physicians and Scientists. We are over 160 people from all over the world, physicians and scientists. And you can find our website at www.globalcovidsummit.org. We are gobsmacked about what’s going on and we are shut down, censored, demeaned, fill in the blank all over the world.
Joe Rogan2:42:00And over a period of two years, the world has completely changed in that regard.
Dr. Robert Malone2:42:03And they’re taking our licenses. License to practice medicine because we are speaking about these matters and you can label me. However you want to label me. I don’t care. I’ve done what I’ve done in my career. I’m at a stage at 62 years old. I’ve got a farm. It’s almost paid off. I raise horses. I love my wife. I’ve been married a long time. My kids are both married. I got grandkids. I don’t need this. This claim I’m doing all this because I seek attention, trust me, this is not a fun thing to be doing at this stage. Physicians at FLCC in senior positions highly like Peter McCullough, people at the culmination of exceptional careers. Paul Marik, an exceptional physician, by any standards, run out of his hospital. Demeaned, destroyed, actively attacked, trying to take his license. This medicine is being destroyed globally. People are losing faith in the whole system. They’re losing faith in the scientific enterprise. They’re losing faith in our government. They are losing faith in the vaccine enterprise. I mean, what is going to be the long term consequences of public health when you have a large fraction of the population who wasn’t anti-vaxxer, that pejorative, before that are now saying, oh, my God. If this is how these people make decisions, I don’t want anything to do with it. I certainly don’t want it jabbed into my kid.
Joe Rogan2:43:47Well, that’s one of the more disturbing things. The opposite of that is one of the more disturbing things about this pandemic is how people have just decided because they’re scared and because they want a solution, that the pharmaceutical companies have their best interests at hearts and that they’re not these machines that are designed to make money and they sell drugs. And the drugs are often beneficial. But their main goal is to make money. And if they can fudge the data, if they can move the numbers around, if they can delete negative consequences…
Dr. Robert Malone2:44:22Pfizer is one of the most criminal pharmaceutical organizations in the world based on their past legal history and fines. What do those fines include? Bribing physicians. It is a cost benefit analysis in the pharmaceutical industry about misbehavior. They are not grounded in the ethical principles that you and I, as average people believe in. They don’t live in that world, as you appropriately point out, they are about profit return on investment. And Furthermore, the overlords that own them, Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street, etc. These large, massive funds that are completely decoupled from nation States have no moral core. They have no moral purpose. Their only purpose is return on investment. And that is the core problem here. That and the fact that we, as a society, have become grossly fragmented through social media, electronic appliances, the stress of what we’ve experienced. And this leads into this whole issue of mass formation psychosis that Mattias Desmet at the University of Ghent has promoted that for many of us that when Mattias, a psychologist and statistician, interesting combination, came and made public a lot of us…as we listened to Matthias, we said, oh, that makes sense. That was like the brain. What happened when I encountered the Trusted News Initiative I said, oh, I don’t know if you saw the Brett Weinstein podcast with me and Steve Kirsch that lit this whole fire all over the world, Brett ends with basically the question, if you listen to the long version of how does this happen, how do we have this emergent phenomena? The how question, right. And behind the how question is the why question, the how question of a third of the population basically being hypnotized and totally wrapped up in whatever Tony Fauci and mainstream media feeds them, whatever CNN tells them is true. Let me illustrate that. The other day I was looking through New York Times recent articles about Omicron and pediatrics in preparation for this and for making some slideshows. And I saw this headline in The New York Times. Epidemiologist and a Vaccinologist. And the title was “How You Should Think About Children and Omicron”. It was blatantly saying, this is how you should think. We’re going to tell you how to think. Okay, people kind of got to get that in their head. That’s the world we’re in right now. What Mattias Desmet has shared with us, brilliant insight, is another one of those, “Aha, now that part makes sense”. Which is that this comes from basically your opinion, intellectual inquiry, into what the heck happened in Germany in the ’20s and ’30s. Very intelligent, highly educated population, and they went barking mad. And how did that happen? The answer is mass formation psychosis. When you have a society that has become decoupled from each other and has free floating anxiety and a sense that things don’t make sense, we can’t understand it. And then their attention gets focused by a leader or a series of events on one small point, just like hypnosis, they literally become hypnotized and can be led anywhere. And one of the aspects of that phenomena is the people that they identify as their leaders, the ones typically that come in and say, you have this pain and I can solve it for you. I and I alone can fix this problem for you. Then they will follow that person. It doesn’t matter whether they lie to them or whatever. The data are irrelevant. And Furthermore, anybody who questions that narrative is to be immediately attacked. They are the other. This is central to mass formation psychosis. And this is what has happened. We had all those conditions. If you remember, back before 2019, everybody was complaining. The world doesn’t make sense. Blah, blah, blah. And we’re all isolated from each other. We’re all on our little tools. We’re not connected socially anymore, except through social media. And then this thing happened and everybody focused on it. That is how mass formation psychosis happens. And that is what’s happened here. Now there’s ways to get out of it. Matthias recommendation is you got to get people to realize that what we’ve got is a situation of global totalitarianism. In his experience in Europe, making people realize there’s a bigger threat than the virus can cause a separation psychologically in this fusion, this hypnosis that has happened, the problem is then you’re just substituting a bigger boogeyman from the current one and somebody else can come in and manipulate. That the real problem. And it gets back to your core point. We’re sick as a society, and we have to heal ourselves. And one of the things we have to do is come together. We have to recreate our social bonds. We have to buy into integrity, the importance of human dignity and the importance of community. That’s how we get out of this. And I think that this insight of Mattias Desmet is really central to kind of making sense out of all of this crazy. We got a world in which the press is incentivized to push a storyline because they’re all controlled by the same large funds that Pfizer is, and so is tech. I don’t know how we’re going to get out of it, but it’s got to start with us, all of us finding common ground.
Joe Rogan2:51:12I think one way we’re going to get out of it is by realizing what it is. And by the way, you just explained it. And the way Peter McCullough explained it. And he was on the podcast as well. This mass formation psychosis that we’re currently experiencing, most people are unaware of this even happening. All these events take place. And it’s this perfect storm of the social media aspect of it, the fact that we are disconnected, the COVID, the separation, the isolation from society, the lockdowns also coming off of the four years of Trump where we’re so polarized politically and it’s become very, not just common, but accepted to other people to point at those, the others, whether it’s the Republicans or the Democrats or the Independents, whatever you choose
Dr. Robert Malone2:52:06Or the unvaccinated.
Joe Rogan2:52:07Or the unvaccinated. That was I was going to get to. Yea. And that’s one of the things that I find very bizarre about the tribal aspect of this is that people want me to get vaccinated. And like my friends who’ve been vaccinated want me to join the team. Like, go ahead, get the tattoo. Like, what are you saying? And I’m like, I’ve gone through the virus. I have immunity. I also have antibodies. I just checked them last week, like, I could show you the test. As a matter of fact, I have it right here. There it is.
Dr. Robert Malone2:52:39And I had to be tested when I came in the front door at your shop here.
Joe Rogan2:52:43Yeah, we test everybody. But the point being is it doesn’t make any sense for me to get vaccinated. But they want me to join.
Dr. Robert Malone2:52:49 It’s worse than that, it puts you at higher risk.
Joe Rogan2:52:53Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone2:52:54Okay. They’re asking you to take more risk for your health in order to join their club.
Joe Rogan2:53:00That’s what it is. And that’s what it is. It’s a tribal formation, and it’s people who don’t have personal sovereignty and people who aren’t confident with standing by their own thoughts and objectively analyzing things outside of an ideology outside of the tribe. Those people are very susceptible right now, and those are more common than not.
Dr. Robert Malone2:53:26So, Joe, again, this is not me buttering you up. But this is why you’re providing such a service to your country and humanity because you’re one of the few voices that has an audience that is not Democrat or Republican or black or white or vaccinated or unvaccinated. All these dipoles that we create artificially, and you are trying to speak to that persuadable middle and do so with an open heart and an open mind. And in a world in which all of the information is being so carefully manipulated and so pervasively distorted. And I’m grateful sincerely, my colleagues are grateful. And I think the world should be grateful for your leadership.
Joe Rogan2:54:29Well, I’m very grateful that there are courageous people like yourself that do put your reputations and your careers on the line by speaking out against this stuff when it is very difficult. And when you do get de-platformed for doing that. They know that by censoring you, they’re not just censoring you. They’re also making others like you self censoring.
Dr. Robert Malone2:54:49Absolutely. I’ve been self censoring for months. Every morning when we post on Twitter, my wife and I, Jill Glasspool Malone, PhD, right, have this active dialogue. Can we post this? How do we say this? So we’re not going to get de-platformed, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. We’re constantly self censoring.
Joe Rogan2:55:12And it’s crazy because you’re self censoring about your area of expertise, which is insane because the people are censoring. You don’t have any education in it.
Dr. Robert Malone2:55:22Yes, I agree. It’s insane. It’s the world we’re in.
Joe Rogan2:55:28I’m just hoping that that clip where you explained this mass formation psychosis makes the rounds. And I think everything you’ve laid out today is about as clear and as rational and as well documented as I could have hoped and more. So, thank you very much for being here. Thank you very much for everything that you’ve done. And Jesus Christ, Twitter put the fucking guy back on it’s.
Dr. Robert Malone2:55:56It’s ok. So you do martial arts, and so you get the idea of using your opponent’s energy against him.
Joe Rogan2:56:05Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone2:56:05Okay. I was immediately contacted by multiple lawyers.
Joe Rogan2:56:11Sure.
Dr. Robert Malone2:56:12This could be an excellent example case.
Joe Rogan2:56:16I think it is between you and Alex Berenson.
Dr. Robert Malone2:56:21Who’s already filed one.
Joe Rogan2:56:23Yes.
Dr. Robert Malone2:56:22Okay. I’ve been through the legal grind. I don’t want to sue anybody. Frankly, it just sucks the blood out of you, not to mention your financial resources. It’s just an ugly process. I hate it. But there’s two hills that are willing I’m willing to die on. One is stopping the jabs and the children, and one is resisting the erosion of free speech, which is the fundamental principle on which our democracy in our society, civilized Western culture is built on. I like to say when I give rallies, do you remember back a couple of years ago when you felt sorry for the people and the People’s Republic of China because their Internet was filtered, they weren’t allowed free speech. The government told them what to do and think. Okay, now here we are. Okay. And the next thing that we all feel sorry about social credit system. Okay, wake up, folks.
Joe Rogan2:57:34Wake up. It’s coming. If we give into this and we give into vaccine, passports and having an app on your phone that shows everything you’re doing in terms of your medical history, and they’ve even offered people extra credit? There was an article on Yahoo about having access to your browser history, and they framed it in a very positive way that having access to your browser history may allow you to receive extra credit. So you’d have credit available to buy a home or a car.
Dr. Robert Malone2:58:06So bingo. Okay. We already know what social credit systems feel like. We call it our credit rating agencies. Okay. And you know what those guys do. It doesn’t matter whether or not if it’s on your record, it doesn’t matter whether or not you did it or what the extenuating circumstances were. It’s in their algorithm, and you will get your score. And your score basically will determine the tax on your access to credit in the form of the interest that you pay on the money that they have been given by the federal government. Okay. That’s the way this ecosystem works. They get that money at a huge discount, and then they decide how worthy you are to receive it if you want to have credit. And so if you want to understand a little tiny version of the social credit system, it’s right there in your credit score.
Joe Rogan2:58:59I think the only thing that helps us here is that this may be the one subject where everyone loses. People on the left, people on the right, people in the center, everyone loses if they impart a social credit system, if there is some sort of social credit app that you have to carry around on your phone that determines where you’re allowed to go, what you’re allowed to do, we’re all going to lose.
Dr. Robert Malone2:59:25No, I disagree. The oligarchs win.
Joe Rogan2:59:30A very small percentage of the population wins. Yes, right. But I mean the general public, the people, the people that are divided about COVID, the people that are now othering each other. And you losers who got the jab and look at you unvaccinated plague rats. This nonsense is going on. Maybe this will be the one thing that unites us because we’ll realize that this is tyranny.
Dr. Robert Malone2:59:49Or if it won’t. Welcome to the new boss, you know, welcome to the new overlords guys. And it’s your choice. I’m going to be dead. I’m 62.
Joe Rogan3:00:04You look good.
Dr. Robert Malone3:00:05Thanks, you’re kind.
Joe Rogan3:00:06You got some years in you, bro. Settle in.
Dr. Robert Malone3:00:09It’s our children.
Joe Rogan3:00:10Yeah, it is our children. They’re challenged uniquely already because they are growing up with social media. They’re growing up with TikTok and these invasive apps that are tracking all their movement and everything they do and buy and see and what they look up and they cross platform. They share this data cross platform. It’s very sketchy stuff. And the fact that it’s happened and it happened so quickly and that our data, which seemed to be nothing, became one of the most valuable commodities in the world. And that data is used to manipulate all the people on the planet.
Dr. Robert Malone3:00:51So we’re touching on some deep stuff about the kids. And forgive me for an unabashed promotion for the Unity project, which I serve as chief medical and regulatory officer for. So that’s unityprojectonline.com. Or org. Com. We’re totally focused on the kids. And if you go on that site, you’ll see a podcast that I did with a pediatric psychiatrist out of L.A. and a pediatric cardiologist who’s also a PhD in vascular inflammation, Kirk Milhoan, and I got those two guys on to talk about what’s happening to our children and in particular, the psychological damage of these lockdowns, this mask use, the school policies, the bullying of children who are unvaccinated. The psychological damage is huge. We’re having a worldwide epidemic of suicide in children. We are having a huge surge of drug abuse in adolescence. We’re having demonstrable drops in IQ and fundamental developmental milestones in the very young, like 20 IQ points. Children have to see faces to learn how to speak and to interact socially. You’re talking about social intelligence, which you’re deep in and connectedness. We’re raising a generation of children that have been blocked from their ability, because their brains are developing extremely rapidly at this age, the ability for their brains to assimilate the information necessary for them to become functional citizens and parents. We’re destroying it without a second thought. And the damage is going to last for generations. And as if that’s not bad enough, we’re allowing the state to insert itself into the family and make decisions by mandating vaccination. This is why these childhood vaccine mandates are obscene. We’re setting up a situation in which children are going to see peers, who have been vaccine damaged as a consequence of the policies that their teachers and their government have forced on them. The damage here is going to be with us for generations. I’m not being chicken little here. This is deep, profound stuff. It’s way beyond myocarditis and no one seems to care. No one talks to children. There was a big breakthrough. We all celebrated a week ago. Face The Nation, on the annual round up of stories that have been underreported, one of the speakers got up, journalist, and said to the other group, I think one of the most underreported stories has been the damage that’s happened to our children.
Joe Rogan3:04:22I saw that.
Dr. Robert Malone3:04:23And did you see what happened with the other journalists?
Joe Rogan3:04:26No.
Dr. Robert Malone3:04:27Nobody said a word. They moved on. It was hardly covered in the media.
Joe Rogan3:04:33Well, she even glossed over the damage by the vaccine.
Dr. Robert Malone3:04:36Agreed. How could she speak about the vaccines? I suspect she may lose her job. She’s not going to be invited back on that program again I doubt. How could she speak about the damage of the vaccines?
Joe Rogan3:04:49She really just briefly touched on it. Yeah, the point is because it’s dangerous.
Dr. Robert Malone3:04:56Insanely dangerous to speak truth to power right now before we wrap this up.
Joe Rogan3:05:02Why is the vaccine uniquely dangerous to children?
Dr. Robert Malone3:05:06Good question. Here’s the problem with the myocarditis bias in children in the data set, particularly boys. One of the things there is clearly an androgen component to the risk of both the vaccine and the disease of the virus. And that’s why anti-androgens by the way, Pierre Kory, shout out to him for a champion of anti-androgens being added to his math plus protocol, particularly for men. So why are boys, there’s probably a component of that that has to do with an artifact in the data. That being that when us old codgers in general, as a population, have a much higher risk of cardiac events. And so if there’s a heart attack in one of us, it’s really hard to say is it just because we’re old or is it vaccine related? Okay, so then the vaccine if there are vaccine related events buried in that, we’re not going to see them. Statistically, it’s really hard to pull it out. Whereas kids don’t have heart attacks and they don’t have strokes. So you can see those things really clearly against the background of virtually nothing. So it may be partially an artifact of reporting and bias because of confounding variables. And it may be there are other effects in terms of your over broader question, moving outside of the myocarditis, why are children more susceptible to these adverse events? I think they’re not. I think the problem is that we’re seeing it in the kids, but it’s present in the adult population. Also, I think there is a significant reporting bias going on against reporting adult vaccine injury. I think that we have more, and why would I say that? Because I’m a vaccine denier, I’m a bad guy and I have some perverse incentive to have that media hit me. No. We have these reports from hospitalists and nurses, the ones that often it’s the nurses that are able to speak. For some reason, the nurses are disclosing things that they’re seeing in their hospitals and the physicians are all shutting up. Is it because they have financial incentives or because they are all owned because they have such debt burdens? I don’t know. But the nurses are speaking out and they’re saying, hey, we’re seeing strokes and heart attacks and these other types of problems that are known to be associated with the jabs. It’s hard to say because we got the virus and the vaccines overlapping. Is it chicken or egg? We know that they’re happening. We know that the deaths are happening. That’s like the excuses that are made about the sudden deaths in high performing athletes that are being observed all over the world, particularly in footballers, where they’re just suddenly dropping. Is it because they’ve been infected or because they’ve been jabbed? I think it’s a mixture of both. But if it’s from the vaccines, the thing about the vaccines is that we have this principle we used to of do no harm if a virus naturally infects you and you have a damage from it. I haven’t caused that damage as a physician. If I’m recommending that you take a drug and intervention they didn’t need, you may or may not have gotten infected and it causes damage. Well, I got to kind of own that as a physician, as a representative of the medical industrial complex and a participant in it, for whatever reason, there’s an under reporting bias clearly in the adult population, and I think that people be me a little more sensitive to adverse events and deaths in their children.
Joe Rogan3:09:29Robert, thank you for everything. I really appreciate you being here. If people want to read more of your work now that you’ve been banned from Twitter, are you still on LinkedIn or are you gone from LinkedIn?
Dr. Robert Malone3:09:42I’m still on LinkedIn. I’m really cautious on LinkedIn. I’m on Gettr and I’m on Substack. So that’s RW Malone, MD. And who knows?
Joe Rogan3:09:55Substack is probably the best place, though, right? It’s the least censored?
Dr. Robert Malone3:09:58The problem with Substack. Yeah, it is the least censored. And I would love more Substack subscriptions, but I have a financial conflict of interest there, so I don’t want to pump it, but that is. I try to use Substack for more in depth intellectual pieces, thought pieces. Not just, I mean, Alex bless his heart. He blasts everything out as if Substack is Twitter. It’s not my style. So I’m going to be using Gettr for that thread.
Joe Rogan3:10:23Gettr. What is that?
Dr. Robert Malone3:10:25That’s a Twitter alternative. Oh, Gettr. Yes.
Joe Rogan3:10:30I’ve been waiting for one, though.
Dr. Robert Malone3:10:31Yeah. So I’m using Gettr. And again @rwmallon, MD.
Joe Rogan3:10:37Is it spelled like G-E-T-T-E-R?
Dr. Robert Malone3:10:39G-E-T-T-R.
Joe Rogan3:10:41Are you on it Jamie? No? G-E-T-T-R?
Dr. Robert Malone3:10:44Yeah. So Gettr is branded as the Twitter killer. It is explicitly a Twitter alternative.
Joe Rogan3:10:52Is it all right wing crazy people?
Dr. Robert Malone3:10:54No.
Joe Rogan3:10:57It’s a lot of people that started off.
Dr. Robert Malone3:10:59Yeah, they are committed to not censoring.
Joe Rogan3:11:07Beautiful. Well, I support that entirely. I mean, there’s a problem with some of these that they do get infected by people that were shit posters. What shit posters are people just. Yeah.
Dr. Robert Malone3:11:19I mean, I’ve been on social media a long time.
Joe Rogan3:11:22I’m sure you have.
Dr. Robert Malone3:11:22I used to be on Yahoo sock chatboards. That’s kind of where I cut my teeth.
Joe Rogan3:11:26Well, Robert, thank you very much. Just thank you for everything. And I hope this helps.
Dr. Robert Malone3:11:34Thank you. So seriously. Thank you for your service to your nation and to the world, Mr. Rogan.
Joe Rogan3:11:41My pleasure. Thank you. Thanks for everything. Bye, everybody. So, folks, we actually went outside and talked, and Robert realized that he had forgotten to tell everybody about this rally. And then I picked up Snoop who’s with me now.So there is a rally January 23. Where is it you want to give us the details?
Dr. Robert Malone3:12:02Washington, DC, between the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial. So this is the Defeat the Mandates, an American homecoming rally. And thanks a lot for letting me put the plug in. The website is www.defeatthemandatesdc.com. So this is not about being anti-vaccines. It’s about being anti mandates. And our hope is that we bring people together. I know that’s one of your core messages, people from every walk of life, every party, every religion, every ethnic background, Democrat, Republican, Vaccinated, unvaccinated. The thing that we can agree on is personal Liberty and the right of people to make their own choice. And that’s what this rally is about is to resist these mandates of the vaccine, whether you believe in it or don’t believe in it. I hope that you believe in the integrity and freedom of your fellow man and woman to make their own bodily choices. So this is going to be part of the same day worldwide rally for freedom that’s going to come across the entire world. This is in Australia, in Europe, in UK and in the United States for the first time. So we ask that you join us. Our objective is to end the vaccine mandates and also no vaccine passports. No vaccination for healthy children. No to censorship, no to limits on reasonable debate. And this censorship and propaganda that we’re constantly bombarded with. We believe in the power of natural immunity. We believe and insist on informed consent. And we insist on allowing doctors and patients making decisions without interference together. So, Joe, thank you for allowing me to correct my grievous error here.
Joe Rogan3:14:07No worries. We realized it. So one more time with the website. It’s defeatthemanddates.com?
Dr. Robert Malone3:14:13No, it’s defeatthemanddatesdc.com. And you can find all the information. January 23 It’s a Sunday. Join not just with people in the United States, but from all over the world for our common good.
Joe Rogan3:14:27Beautiful. Thank you. Thanks again, everyone.

16 replies on “Joe Rogan Interview with Dr. Robert Malone [Transcript and Full Interview ]”

Natzi Germany on deck, Josef Mengele reanimated as Anthony Fauci, we have seen this movie before, the ending is a blood bath

First of all, thank you for the transcript. However, I noticed the time tracking is off, out of sync. Am I right?

Thank you for taking the time to share this. Maybe it’s my current browser (iOS safari) but I am not able to see the actual transcript-or link to it – just time stamps – any help would be greatly appreciated

“If you have natural immunity, you are at higher risk if you get vaccine 2:52:50”

He makes this statement but gives no reason why. Any studies or information to explain this? It is what I have been trying to figure out for our family.

Because you are compounding the effects of your natural immune response with several more forced immune response with each vaccine and booster. Now you’ve had vivid twice = 2 responses. Three vaccines = 3 more responses. You have had exposure 5 times.
Also when you naturally come in contact with the virus it is more localized to you nasopharyngeal, respirator system. The vaccine is administered in your muscle. It is disseminated through your entire system. Therefore possibly touching areas it might not touch or spread too via natural infection.

Dr Malone mentioned that those with a Covid infection were at a higher risk for injury from the vaccines. This is exactly the information I have been fruitlessly searching for (effects of vaccine on those who’ve had Covid), but haven’t been able to find. Are there any studies or any information on WHY he said this? Why is it worse to have had the infection? Are these the people that are having severe reactions to the vaccine?

Thank you for any help.

These interviews with Joe Rogan and Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone moved his podcast to a whole new level of professionalism. I’ve gained a strong new respect for Joe Rogan and his podcast. Joe, don’t let Neil Young and other artists pressure you to stop bringing the truth to your audience. Threatening to remove their music because of the truth coming out of the mouths of highly respected scientists, is simply another form of censure and bullying. They can’t handle the truth. Isn’t it odd that freedom of speech is relegated only to those with a message of how great the vaccines are. Freedom of speech is denied to those who speak outside of the scripted propaganda. That is the backbone of communism.

The uncle of a friend of mine had a heart attack several months ago and was rushed to the hospital, where he died. He was covid positive and it was termed a covid death. A friend was in a motorcycle accident, rushed to the hospital, where he eventually died. He was covid positive and was listed as a covid death. In a town nearby, a roofer fell off the ladder (because he was forced to wear a mask, outside, while working outside in the summer heat), died from his injuries at the hospital, and was listed as a covid death. In the last case, his family raised a ruckus because his family was denied accidental death benefits because he “died from covid”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.